M. (minor), et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al.
Filing
4
ORDER Relating Cases and Reassigning Action to United States District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill and Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone; ORDERED to Relate Cases 1:13-cv-1055 LJO-SAB and 1:14-cv-60 LJO-SAB to this case; New case number is 1:15-cv-01709 LJO-SAB, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 11/12/2015. (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
C.M., by and through her Guardian ad
Case No. 1:15-cv-01709---EPG
Litem, Helen Cervantes,individually, and as
successor-in-interest to RAMON
New Case No. 1:15-cv-01709-LJO-SAB
TALAMANTEZ MENDOZA, et al.,
ORDER RELATING CASES AND
Plaintiffs,
REASSIGNING ACTION TO UNITED STATES
DISTRICT JUDGE LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL
v.
AND MAGISTRATE JUDGE STANELY A.
BOONE
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
On November 9, 2015, Plaintiff filed this action alleging deliberate indifference in
violation of the Eighth Amendment and racial discrimination in violation of the Fourteenth
Amendment. (ECF No. 1.) The complaint generally alleges that the defendants were deliberately
indifferent by housing Ramon Talamantez Mendoza at Pleasant Valley State Prison due to the
prevalence of Valley Fever in the area.
A series of similar actions have been related and consolidated. A review of this action
reveals that it is related under Local Rule 123 to the actions entitled Jackson, et al. v. State of
California, et al., 1:13-cv-01055-LJO-SAB; and Smith, et al. v. Schwarzeneggar, et al., 1:14-cv00060-LJO-SAB. The actions are based on the same underlying facts and involve overlapping
questions of law and fact.
28
1
1
2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.
3
4
and 1:14-cv-00060-LJO-SAB;
2.
5
6
The Office of the Clerk shall relate this case with cases 1:13-cv-01055-LJO-SAB
This case shall be assigned to the docket of District Judge Lawrence J. O’Neill and
Magistrate Judge Stanely A. Boone;
3.
The new case number shall be:
7
1:15-cv-01709-LJO-SAB
8
and all future pleadings and/or correspondence must be so numbered. The parties
9
are advised that use of an incorrect case number, including initials, may result in a
10
delay of documents being processed and copies thereof being correctly distributed
11
and received by the appropriate judicial officer.
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
Dated:
November 12, 2015
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?