M. (minor), et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al.

Filing 9

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH ORDER SETTING MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/10/2016. (Hernandez, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

M., et al.,
Plaintiffs,

12
13
14

Case No. 1:15-cv-01709-LJO-SAB
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO
SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS
SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH ORDER
SETTING MANDATORY SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE

v.
SCHWARZENEGGER, et al.,
Defendants.

15

(ECF No. 5-1)
16
FIVE DAY DEADLINE
17
18

On November 13, 2015 an order issued reassigning this action to the undersigned. On

19 November 16, 2015, an order setting the mandatory scheduling conference issued. Pursuant to
20 the November 16, 2015 order, the parties were required to appear for a mandatory scheduling
21 conference on March 8, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. and file a joint scheduling report one week prior to the
22 conference. The parties did not file a joint statement or appear for the March 8, 2016 scheduling
23 conference. Further, the Court notes that Plaintiffs have not filed a notice that service has been
24 completed in this action.
25

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

26

1.

Within five days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiffs shall show cause

27

in writing why sanctions should not issue for the failure to comply with or

28

otherwise respond to the November 16, 2016 order.

1

2.

1

Plaintiffs are advised that failure to comply with this order will result in the
issuance up sanctions, up to and including dismissal of this action.

2
3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5 Dated:

March 10, 2016
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2