Rhodes v. Fresno County, et al.
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Action Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Comply With a Court Order signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/18/2017. Show Cause Response due within twenty (20) days. (Jessen, A)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
PERCY LEE RHODES,
FRESNO COUNTY, et al.,
Case No.: 1:15-cv-01714-SAB (PC)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE
TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER
[ECF No. 29]
Plaintiff Percy Lee Rhodes is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of
the United States Magistrate Judge on November 23, 2015. Local Rule 302.
On December 8, 2016, the Court screened Plaintiff’s second amended complaint and directed
Plaintiff to file a third amended complaint or notify the Court of his intent to proceed on the claims
found to be cognizable within thirty days. (ECF No. 29.) Over thirty days have passed and Plaintiff
has failed to respond to the Court’s order. Accordingly, within twenty (20) days from the date of
service of this order, Plaintiff shall show cause why the action should not be dismissed for failure to
prosecute. The failure to respond to this order will result in dismissal of the action for failure to
prosecute. Local Rule 110.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
January 18, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?