Rhodes v. Fresno County, et al.

Filing 31

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Action Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Comply With a Court Order signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/18/2017. Show Cause Response due within twenty (20) days. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 PERCY LEE RHODES, 8 Plaintiff, 9 10 v. FRESNO COUNTY, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:15-cv-01714-SAB (PC) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER [ECF No. 29] Plaintiff Percy Lee Rhodes is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 14 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of 15 the United States Magistrate Judge on November 23, 2015. Local Rule 302. On December 8, 2016, the Court screened Plaintiff’s second amended complaint and directed 16 17 Plaintiff to file a third amended complaint or notify the Court of his intent to proceed on the claims 18 found to be cognizable within thirty days. (ECF No. 29.) Over thirty days have passed and Plaintiff 19 has failed to respond to the Court’s order. Accordingly, within twenty (20) days from the date of 20 service of this order, Plaintiff shall show cause why the action should not be dismissed for failure to 21 prosecute. The failure to respond to this order will result in dismissal of the action for failure to 22 prosecute. Local Rule 110. 23 24 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 18, 2017 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?