Rhodes v. Fresno County, et al.

Filing 31

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Action Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Comply With a Court Order signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/18/2017. Show Cause Response due within twenty (20) days. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7

PERCY LEE RHODES,

8

Plaintiff,

9
10

v.
FRESNO COUNTY, et al.,

11

Defendants.

12
13

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:15-cv-01714-SAB (PC)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE
TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER
[ECF No. 29]

Plaintiff Percy Lee Rhodes is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action

14

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of

15

the United States Magistrate Judge on November 23, 2015. Local Rule 302.
On December 8, 2016, the Court screened Plaintiff’s second amended complaint and directed

16
17

Plaintiff to file a third amended complaint or notify the Court of his intent to proceed on the claims

18

found to be cognizable within thirty days. (ECF No. 29.) Over thirty days have passed and Plaintiff

19

has failed to respond to the Court’s order. Accordingly, within twenty (20) days from the date of

20

service of this order, Plaintiff shall show cause why the action should not be dismissed for failure to

21

prosecute. The failure to respond to this order will result in dismissal of the action for failure to

22

prosecute. Local Rule 110.

23
24
25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

January 18, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28
1