Rhodes v. Fresno County, et al.
Filing
47
SECOND ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Re-Serve the Court's March 16, 2017 Order 37 . Along with the Necessary Service of Process Documents, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 6/7/17. Service Documents Return Deadline: Thirty Days. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
PERCY LEE RHODES,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
FRESNO COUNTY, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:15-cv-01714-SAB (PC)
SECOND ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF
COURT TO RE-SERVE THE COURT’S MARCH
16, 2017, ORDER ALONG WITH THE
NECESSARY SERVICE OF PROCESS
DOCUMENTS
[ECF Nos. 37, 46]
Plaintiff Percy Lee Rhodes is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s second motion for a copy of the Court’s March 16,
20
2017, order. Plaintiff contends that although he received the Court’s March 16, 2017, order he did not
21
receive the necessary service of process documents. Plaintiff therefore requests that the Court re-send
22
a copy of the service documents.
23
24
On the basis of good cause, the Court will direct the Clerk of Court to re-send a copy of the
Court’s March 16, 2017, order along with the necessary service of process documents.
25
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
26
1.
27
The Clerk of Court shall re-send Plaintiff a copy of the Court’s March 16, 2017, order
along with the necessary service of process documents;
28
1
2.
1
2
Within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall complete
and return the necessary service of process forms; and
3.
3
The failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of the action.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
Dated:
7
June 7, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?