Rhodes v. Fresno County, et al.

Filing 6

ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:15-cv-2220 KJN) to Fresno (1:15-cv-1714 LJO) signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/10/15. (Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

PERCY LEE RHODES,

12
13
14

No. 2:15-cv-2220 DAD P (TEMP)

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

FRESNO COUNTY, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42

18

U.S.C. § 1983, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. In his complaint, plaintiff

19

alleges violations of his civil rights by defendants. The alleged violations took place in Fresno

20

County, which is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern

21

District of California. See Local Rule 120(d).

22

Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper

23

division of a court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the

24

court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court. In light of the

25

1996 amendments to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, this court will not rule on plaintiff’s request to proceed in

26

forma pauperis.

27

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

28

1. This court has not ruled on plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis;
1

1
2
3
4

2. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
California sitting in Fresno;
3. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be
filed at:
United States District Court
Eastern District of California
2500 Tulare Street
Fresno, CA 93721

5
6
7
8

Dated: November 10, 2015

9
10
11
12

/rhod2220.22

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2