Rhodes v. Fresno County, et al.

Filing 80

ORDER EXTENDING Discovery and Scheduling Order to Defendant Pat Alexander 79 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 01/16/18. (Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

PERCY LEE RHODES,

12

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

FRESNO COUNTY, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16

Case No. 1:15-cv-01714-DAD-SAB (PC)
ORDER EXTENDING DISCOVERY AND
SCHEDULING ORDER TO DEFENDANT PAT
ALEXANDER
[ECF No. 79]

Plaintiff Percy Lee Rhodes is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action

17
18

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

19

This action is proceeding against Defendants Vivian, L. Her, Pat Alexander, K. Nunez,

20

Jennifer Horton, Dr. Ravijot Gill and Laure Rodriguez for deliberate indifference to a serious medical

21

need under the Fourteenth Amendment.
On October 3, 2017, Defendants Jennifer Horton, K. Nunez, L. Her, and Vivien Tagoe filed an

22
23

answer to the second amended complaint. (ECF Nos. 64, 65.)

24

On October 5, 2017, the Court issued the discovery and scheduling order. (ECF No. 67.)

25

On January 12, 2018, Defendant Pat Alexander filed an answer to the complaint. (ECF No.

26

79.)

27

///

28

///
1

Inasmuch as Defendant Pat Alexander filed an answer to the complaint after the issuance of the

1
2

discovery and scheduling order, the October 5, 2017, order is extended and made applicable

3

Defendant Alexander and all provisions set forth therein remain in full force and effect.

4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6

Dated:

7

January 16, 2018
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2