Rhodes v. Fresno County, et al.
Filing
96
ORDER Denying as Moot Plaintiff's 95 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 08/02/2019. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
PERCY LEE RHODES,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
FRESNO COUNTY, et al.,
Case No. 1:15-cv-01714-DAD-SAB (PC)
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF
COUNSEL
(ECF No. 95)
Defendants.
16
17
On October 25, 2015, Plaintiff Percy Lee Rhodes filed the instant action pursuant to 42
18
U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1.) On August 20, 2018, Plaintiff filed a notice of dismissal pursuant to
19
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). (ECF No. 89.) Defendants filed a statement of non-
20
opposition to Plaintiff’s request for dismissal. (ECF No. 91.) On August 28, 2018, the Court issued
21
an order directing the Clerk of Court to close this case pursuant to the parties’ stipulation for
22
voluntary dismissal, and this case was closed the same day. (ECF No. 92.)
23
On July 26, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion to reopen this case under Federal Rule of Civil
24
Procedure 60(b). (ECF No. 93.) On August 1, 2019, the Court denied Plaintiff’s motion to reopen
25
this case. (ECF No. 94).
26
Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s request for the appointment of counsel, filed on July
27
31, 2019. (ECF No. 95). Plaintiff asserts that he needs the assistance of counsel because he is a
28
novice at law, has no formal legal training, is taking medication for his medical problems, and this
1
1
case involves multiple defendants and complex legal and medical issues.
2
However, this case was closed on August 28, 2018. (ECF No. 92.) Further, since the Court
3
denied Plaintiff’s motion to reopen this case on August 1, 2019, this case remains closed. (ECF
4
No. 94.) Accordingly, Plaintiff’s request for appointment of counsel, (ECF No. 95), is HEREBY
5
DENIED as moot.
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
August 2, 2019
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?