Hillard et al v. Rite Aid Corporation
Filing
41
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/1/17 ORDERING that plaintiff Bart Hilliard's claims only shall be and hereby are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees with respect to those claims. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
MATTHEW RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 121012)
JOHN GLUGOSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 191551)
MICHAEL RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 258541)
RIGHETTI·GLUGOSKI, P.C.
456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 983-0900
Facsimile: (415) 397-9005
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Bart Hilliard
JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 96838)
JUSTIN M. SCOTT (Cal. State Bar No. 302502)
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
101 California Street, 48th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone:
(415) 856-7000
Facsimile:
(415) 856-7100
jeffwohl@paulhastings.com
justinscott@paullhastings.com
Attorneys for Defendant
Rite Aid Corporation
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
17
BART HILLARD, JOSHUA ROACH,
GARY WILLIAMS,
18
Plaintiffs,
No. 1:15-CV-01748-JAM-EFB
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE OF PLAINTIFF BART
HILLIARD
19
vs.
Judge:
Complaint Filed:
20
21
Hon. John A. Mendez
May 11, 2015
RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1
through 50, inclusive,
22
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION
U.S.D.C. E.D. CAL. NO. 1:15-CV-01748-JAM-EFB
LEGAL_US_W # 92081512.1
1
Plaintiff Bart Hilliard and defendant Rite Aid Corporation, acting through their respective
2
counsel of record, hereby stipulate that plaintiff Hilliard’s claims only shall be dismissed with prejudice
3
pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, each side to bear its own costs and
4
attorneys’ fees.
5
6
Dated: December 1, 2017.
7
MATTHEW RIGHETTI
JOHN GLUGOSKI
MICHAEL RIGHETTI
RIGHETTI·GLUGOSKI, P.C.
8
By: /s/ Michael Righetti
Michael Righetti
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Bart Hilliard
9
10
11
12
Dated: December 1, 2017.
13
14
JEFFREY D. WOHL
JUSTIN M. SCOTT
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
By: /s/ Justin M. Scott
Justin M. Scott
Attorneys for Defendant
Rite Aid Corporation
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION
U.S.D.C. E.D. CAL. NO. 1:15-CV-01748-JAM-EFB
LEGAL_US_W # 92081512.1
1
2
3
4
MATTHEW RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 121012)
JOHN GLUGOSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 191551)
MICHAEL RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 258541)
RIGHETTI·GLUGOSKI, P.C.
456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 983-0900
Facsimile: (415) 397-9005
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Bart Hilliard
JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 96838)
JUSTIN M. SCOTT (Cal. State Bar No. 302502)
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
101 California Street, 48th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone:
(415) 856-7000
Facsimile:
(415) 856-7100
jeffwohl@paulhastings.com
justinscott@paulhastings.com
Attorneys for Defendant
Rite Aid Corporation
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
BART HILLARD, JOSHUA ROACH,
GARY WILLIAMS,
18
Plaintiffs,
19
20
21
22
23
vs.
No. 1:15-CV-01748-JAM-EFB
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE AS TO PLAINTIFF BART
HILLIARD
Judge:
Complaint Filed:
Hon. John A. Mendez
May 11, 2015
RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1
through 50, inclusive,
Defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION
U.S.D.C. E.D. CAL. NO. 1:15-cv-01748-JAM-EFB
LEGAL_US_W # 92081511.1
1
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor,
2
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff Bart Hilliard’s claims only shall be and hereby are DISMISSED
3
WITH PREJUDICE, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees with respect to those claims.
4
5
Dated: December 1, 2017
6
/s/ JOHN A. MENDEZ
John A. Mendez
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION
U.S.D.C. E.D. CAL. NO. 1:15-cv-01748-JAM-EFB
LEGAL_US_W # 92081511.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?