Hillard et al v. Rite Aid Corporation

Filing 41

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/1/17 ORDERING that plaintiff Bart Hilliard's claims only shall be and hereby are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees with respect to those claims. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 MATTHEW RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 121012) JOHN GLUGOSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 191551) MICHAEL RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 258541) RIGHETTI·GLUGOSKI, P.C. 456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 983-0900 Facsimile: (415) 397-9005 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Attorneys for Plaintiff Bart Hilliard JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 96838) JUSTIN M. SCOTT (Cal. State Bar No. 302502) PAUL HASTINGS LLP 101 California Street, 48th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 856-7000 Facsimile: (415) 856-7100 jeffwohl@paulhastings.com justinscott@paullhastings.com Attorneys for Defendant Rite Aid Corporation 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 17 BART HILLARD, JOSHUA ROACH, GARY WILLIAMS, 18 Plaintiffs, No. 1:15-CV-01748-JAM-EFB STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF PLAINTIFF BART HILLIARD 19 vs. Judge: Complaint Filed: 20 21 Hon. John A. Mendez May 11, 2015 RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 22 Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION U.S.D.C. E.D. CAL. NO. 1:15-CV-01748-JAM-EFB LEGAL_US_W # 92081512.1 1 Plaintiff Bart Hilliard and defendant Rite Aid Corporation, acting through their respective 2 counsel of record, hereby stipulate that plaintiff Hilliard’s claims only shall be dismissed with prejudice 3 pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, each side to bear its own costs and 4 attorneys’ fees. 5 6 Dated: December 1, 2017. 7 MATTHEW RIGHETTI JOHN GLUGOSKI MICHAEL RIGHETTI RIGHETTI·GLUGOSKI, P.C. 8 By: /s/ Michael Righetti Michael Righetti Attorneys for Plaintiff Bart Hilliard 9 10 11 12 Dated: December 1, 2017. 13 14 JEFFREY D. WOHL JUSTIN M. SCOTT PAUL HASTINGS LLP By: /s/ Justin M. Scott Justin M. Scott Attorneys for Defendant Rite Aid Corporation 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION U.S.D.C. E.D. CAL. NO. 1:15-CV-01748-JAM-EFB LEGAL_US_W # 92081512.1 1 2 3 4 MATTHEW RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 121012) JOHN GLUGOSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 191551) MICHAEL RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 258541) RIGHETTI·GLUGOSKI, P.C. 456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 983-0900 Facsimile: (415) 397-9005 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Attorneys for Plaintiff Bart Hilliard JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 96838) JUSTIN M. SCOTT (Cal. State Bar No. 302502) PAUL HASTINGS LLP 101 California Street, 48th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 856-7000 Facsimile: (415) 856-7100 jeffwohl@paulhastings.com justinscott@paulhastings.com Attorneys for Defendant Rite Aid Corporation 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 BART HILLARD, JOSHUA ROACH, GARY WILLIAMS, 18 Plaintiffs, 19 20 21 22 23 vs. No. 1:15-CV-01748-JAM-EFB ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AS TO PLAINTIFF BART HILLIARD Judge: Complaint Filed: Hon. John A. Mendez May 11, 2015 RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION U.S.D.C. E.D. CAL. NO. 1:15-cv-01748-JAM-EFB LEGAL_US_W # 92081511.1 1 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, 2 IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff Bart Hilliard’s claims only shall be and hereby are DISMISSED 3 WITH PREJUDICE, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees with respect to those claims. 4 5 Dated: December 1, 2017 6 /s/ JOHN A. MENDEZ John A. Mendez United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION U.S.D.C. E.D. CAL. NO. 1:15-cv-01748-JAM-EFB LEGAL_US_W # 92081511.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?