Hillard et al v. Rite Aid Corporation
Filing
45
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 1/10/2018 ORDERING that plaintiff Gary Williams's claims only shall be and hereby are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees with respect to those claims.(Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
MATTHEW RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 121012)
JOHN GLUGOSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 191551)
MICHAEL RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 258541)
RIGHETTI·GLUGOSKI, P.C.
456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 983-0900
Facsimile: (415) 397-9005
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Gary Williams
JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 96838)
JUSTIN M. SCOTT (Cal. State Bar No. 302502)
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
101 California Street, 48th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone:
(415) 856-7000
Facsimile:
(415) 856-7100
jeffwohl@paulhastings.com
justinscott@paullhastings.com
Attorneys for Defendant
Rite Aid Corporation
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
BART HILLARD, JOSHUA ROACH,
GARY WILLIAMS,
18
Plaintiffs,
19
20
21
22
23
vs.
No. 1:15-CV-01748-JAM-EFB
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE OF PLAINTIFF GARY
WILLIAMS
Judge:
Complaint Filed:
Hon. John A. Mendez
May 11, 2015
RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1
through 50, inclusive,
Defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
PLAINTIFF GARY WILLIAMS
U.S.D.C. E.D. CAL. NO. 1:15-CV-01748-JAM-EFB
LEGAL_US_W # 92370309.1
1
Plaintiff Gary Williams and defendant Rite Aid Corporation, acting through their respective
2
counsel of record, hereby stipulate that plaintiff Gary Williams’s claims only shall be dismissed with
3
prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, each side to bear its own
4
costs and attorneys’ fees.
5
Dated: January 10, 2018.
6
MATTHEW RIGHETTI
JOHN GLUGOSKI
MICHAEL RIGHETTI
RIGHETTI·GLUGOSKI, P.C.
7
By: /s/ Michael Righetti
Michael Righetti
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Gary Williams
8
9
10
11
Dated: January 10, 2018.
12
JEFFREY D. WOHL
JUSTIN M. SCOTT
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
13
By: /s/ Justin M. Scott
Justin M. Scott
Attorneys for Defendant
Rite Aid Corporation
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
PLAINTIFF GARY WILLIAMS
U.S.D.C. E.D. CAL. NO. 1:15-CV-01748-JAM-EFB
LEGAL_US_W # 92370309.1
1
2
3
4
MATTHEW RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 121012)
JOHN GLUGOSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 191551)
MICHAEL RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 258541)
RIGHETTI·GLUGOSKI, P.C.
456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 983-0900
Facsimile: (415) 397-9005
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Gary Williams
JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 96838)
JUSTIN M. SCOTT (Cal. State Bar No. 302502)
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
101 California Street, 48th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone:
(415) 856-7000
Facsimile:
(415) 856-7100
jeffwohl@paulhastings.com
justinscott@paulhastings.com
Attorneys for Defendant
Rite Aid Corporation
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
BART HILLARD, JOSHUA ROACH,
GARY WILLIAMS,
18
Plaintiffs,
19
20
21
22
23
No. 1:15-CV-01748-JAM-EFB
ORDER DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE
PLAINTIFF GARY WILLIAMS
Judge:
Complaint Filed:
vs.
Hon. John A. Mendez
May 11, 2015
RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1
through 50, inclusive,
Defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL
U.S.D.C. E.D. CAL. NO. 1:15-cv-01748-JAM-EFB
LEGAL_US_W # 92370309.1
1
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor,
2
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff Gary Williams’s claims only shall be and hereby are
3
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees with respect to
4
those claims.
5
6
Dated: 1/10/2018
7
/s/ John A. Mendez_____________
John A. Mendez
United States District Court Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL
U.S.D.C. E.D. CAL. NO. 1:15-cv-01748-JAM-EFB
LEGAL_US_W # 92370309.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?