Hillard et al v. Rite Aid Corporation

Filing 53

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 7/2/2018 ORDERING, pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 MATTHEW RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 121012) JOHN GLUGOSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 191551) MICHAEL RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 258541) RIGHETTI·GLUGOSKI, P.C. 456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 983-0900 Facsimile: (415) 397-9005 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Attorneys for Plaintiff Bart Hillard, Joshua Roach, and Gary Williams JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 96838) JULLIE Z. LAL (Cal. State Bar No. 279067) PAUL HASTINGS LLP 101 California Street, 48th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 856-7000 Facsimile: (415) 856-7100 jeffwohl@paulhastings.com jullielal@paullhastings.com Attorneys for Defendant Rite Aid Corporation 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 BART HILLARD, JOSHUA ROACH, GARY WILLIAMS, 18 Plaintiffs, 19 20 21 22 23 No. 1:15-CV-01748-JAM-EFB STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE Judge: Dept.: vs. RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Hon. John A. Mendez 6, 14th Floor Complaint Filed: May 11, 2015 Defendants. 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE U.S.D.C. E.D. CAL. NO. 1:15-CV-01748-JAM-EFB LEGAL_US_W # 94487784.1 1 Plaintiff Joshua Roach and defendant Rite Aid Corporation, acting through their respective 2 counsel of record, hereby stipulate that this action may be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 3 Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys’ 4 fees. 5 6 Dated: July 2, 2018. 7 MATTHEW RIGHETTI JOHN GLUGOSKI MICHAEL RIGHETTI RIGHETTI·GLUGOSKI, P.C. 8 By: /s/ Michael Righetti Michael Righetti Attorneys for Plaintiffs Bart Hillard, Joshua Roach, and Gary Williams 9 10 11 12 Dated: July 2, 2018. 13 JEFFREY D. WOHL JULLIE Z. LAL PAUL HASTINGS LLP 14 By: /s/ Jullie Z. Lal Jullie Z. Lal Attorneys for Defendant Rite Aid Corporation 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE U.S.D.C. E.D. CAL. NO. 1:15-CV-01748-JAM-EFB LEGAL_US_W # 94487784.1 1 2 3 4 MATTHEW RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 121012) JOHN GLUGOSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 191551) MICHAEL RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 258541) RIGHETTI·GLUGOSKI, P.C. 456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 983-0900 Facsimile: (415) 397-9005 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Attorneys for Plaintiff Bart Hillard, Joshua Roach, and Gary Williams JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 96838) JULLIE Z. LAL (Cal. State Bar No. 279067) PAUL HASTINGS LLP 101 California Street, 48th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 856-7000 Facsimile: (415) 856-7100 jeffwohl@paulhastings.com jullielal@paullhastings.com Attorneys for Defendant Rite Aid Corporation 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 BART HILLARD, JOSHUA ROACH, GARY WILLIAMS, 18 Plaintiffs, 19 20 21 22 23 No. 1:15-CV-01748-JAM-EFB ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE Judge: Dept.: vs. RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Hon. John A. Mendez 6, 14th Floor Complaint Filed: May 11, 2015 Defendants. 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL U.S.D.C. E.D. CAL. NO. 1:15-cv-01748-JAM-EFB LEGAL_US_W # 94487775.1 1 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, 2 IT IS ORDERED that this action be and hereby is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each side 3 to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 4 5 Dated: 7/2/2018 6 /s/ John A. Mendez__________ Hon. John A. Mendez United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL U.S.D.C. E.D. CAL. NO. 1:15-cv-01748-JAM-EFB LEGAL_US_W # 94487775.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?