Smith v. Youngblood, et al
Filing
87
ORDER RE STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/18/2022, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: The Settlement Conference currently set for 3/18/2022 is CONTINUED to 4/4/2022 at 11:00 AM in Courtroo m 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. The parties shall submit their confidential settlement conference statementsdirectly to Judge Boone's chambers via email to SABOrders@caed.uscourts.gov no later than one week prior to the conference. (Apodaca, P)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
WESTON ANTHONY SMITH,
Plaintiff,
12
ORDER RE STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
v.
13
14
Case No. 1:15-cv-01749-MCE-BAK
DONNY YOUNGBLOOD, et al.,
(ECF Nos. 82, 86)
Defendants.
15
16
17
On February 18, 2022, the parties submitted a stipulated request to continue the
18 settlement conference currently set for February 25, 2022 to March 25, 2022. (ECF No. 86.)
19 The parties proffer the continuance is required as counsel for Defendant Kern County has been
20 unable to obtain settlement authority from the County due to his mother’s two hospitalizations in
21 the last thirty days.
The Court finds good cause exists to approve the stipulated request.
22 However, the Court shall continue the settlement conference to April 4, 2022.
23
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY
24 ORDERED that:
25
26
1.
The settlement conference set for March 18, 2022, is CONTINUED to April 4,
2022, at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 9 before the honorable Stanley A. Boone; and
27 ///
28 ///
1
2.
1
The parties shall submit their confidential settlement conference statements
2
directly to Judge Boone’s chambers via email to SABOrders@caed.uscourts.gov
3
no later than one week prior to the conference.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6 Dated:
February 18, 2022
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?