Rodriguez v. Brown, et al.

Filing 20

ORDER for Defendant Sherman to Respond to Plaintiff's Motions for Preliminary Injunctive Relief, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 7/1/16. Thirty Day Deadline. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSEPH D. RODRIGUEZ, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 vs. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al., 15 Defendants. 1:15-cv-01754-LJO-GSA-PC ORDER FOR DEFENDANT SHERMAN TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF (ECF Nos. 9, 17.) THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 16 17 18 19 I. BACKGROUND 20 Joseph D. Rodriguez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 21 pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. The case now proceeds 22 on the original Complaint filed by Plaintiff on November 19, 2015, against Stuart Sherman 23 (Warden of the California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility (SATF)) (“Defendant”), for 24 adverse conditions of confinement and related state claims. On June 28, 2016, Defendant 25 Sherman appeared in this action by filing a motion to dismiss the Complaint. (ECF No. 19.) 26 On December 11, 2015, and May 11, 2016, Plaintiff filed motions for temporary 27 restraining orders, requesting preliminary injunctive relief. (ECF Nos. 9, 17.) Defendant 28 Sherman shall be required to respond to these motions within thirty days. 1 1 II. PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS 2 Plaintiff is presently incarcerated at the California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility 3 (SATF) in Corcoran, California. Plaintiff seeks a Court order barring prison staff at SATF 4 from transferring him to another facility while this case is pending, and from retaliating against 5 him for filing this case. Plaintiff also requests that Defendant be ordered to provide Plaintiff 6 with prepackaged meals not prepared at SATF, and allow Plaintiff to consume the meals in his 7 private cell. 8 adequate food prepared, handled, and served at the E-Yard dining facility since being served 9 his second live cockroach on January 13, 2015. Plaintiff requests to be served prepackaged 10 Kosher meals. Plaintiff suggests that he be allowed to remove all prepackaged Kosher meals 11 provided to him from the dining facility, to be consumed in Plaintiff’s cell, pending resolution 12 of this action. 13 Plaintiff claims that Defendant has not provided him with safe, clean, and At this stage of the proceedings, Defendant Sherman shall be required to file a response 14 to Plaintiff’s motions for preliminary injunctive relief, within thirty days. 15 III. CONCLUSION 16 Accordingly, based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty 17 days from the date of service of this order, Defendant Sherman shall file a written response to 18 Plaintiff’s motions seeking preliminary injunctive relief, filed on December 11, 2015 and May 19 11, 2016. 20 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 1, 2016 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?