Tolle v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC

Filing 13

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why This Case Should Not Be Recommended For Dismissal. By no later than March 6, 2017, the parties shall file dismissal documents or a statement showing cause why the Court should not recommend to the presiding district court ju dge that this action be dismissed. The Court further CAUTIONS the parties that, if they fail to file this statement by March 6, 2017, the Court will recommend to the presiding district court judge that this action be dismissed, in its entirety. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 2/27/2017. (Timken, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12

MICHAEL TOLLE,

13
14
15
16
17
18

Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 1:15-cv-01797-LJO-SKO
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE
RECOMMENDED FOR DISMISSAL

PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES
LLC,
Defendant.
_____________________________________/

19
On March 10, 2016, the parties filed a Notice of Settlement indicating that settlement had
20
21
22
23
24

been reached and requesting “45 days to file the necessary dismissal papers.” (Doc. 10.) By its
order entered on March 11, 2016, the Court granted the parties’ request and ordered that the
parties file “appropriate papers to dismiss or conclude this action in its entirety” by April 25, 2016.
(Doc. 11.) The Court cautioned that “[f]ailure to comply with this order may be grounds for the
imposition of sanctions on counsel or parties who contributed to the violation of this order.” (Id.)

25
The parties failed to file their dismissal papers by April 25, 2016. (See Docket.)
26
By its order entered on September 12, 2016, the Court ordered the parties to file their
27
dismissal documents, or a joint status report indicating why such documents cannot be timely
28

1 filed, by no later than 5:00 p.m. on September 21, 2016. (Doc. 12.) To date, no dismissal
2 documents have been filed.
3

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that, by no later than March 6, 2017, the parties shall file

4 dismissal documents or a statement showing cause why the Court should not recommend to the
5 presiding district court judge that this action be dismissed. The Court further CAUTIONS the
6 parties that, if they fail to file this statement by March 6, 2017, the Court will recommend to the
7 presiding district court judge that this action be dismissed, in its entirety.
8

The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this order to Plaintiff at his address listed

9 on the docket for this matter.
10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.

12 Dated:
13

February 27, 2017

/s/

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

.