Washington v. Garcia et al

Filing 40

ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motion to Appear for the Settlement Conference By Video or Telephone 37 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/6/17. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL A. WASHINGTON, 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. G. GARCIA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:15-cv-01805-LJO-SAB (PC) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO APPEAR FOR THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE BY VIDEO OR TELEPHONE [Doc. 37] 17 Plaintiff Michael A. Washington is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 18 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case is currently set for a settlement conference before the 19 undersigned on January 10, 2017. 20 On December 27, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting to appear at the settlement 21 conference by video or telephone. (Doc. 37.) For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s request will 22 be denied. 23 Generally, the Court allows inmates to appear telephonically for all pretrial proceedings. The 24 Court finds, however, that settlement conferences are not productive without the ability to have face to 25 face contact with the participants. As such, the Court requires parties to personally appear for 26 settlement conferences. 27 28 Plaintiff requests that he be allowed to appear by video conference or telephone. Due to importance of face to face contact and issues that may arise with video conferencing and telephone 1 1 systems, the parties will be required to attend the settlement conference in person. The Court notes, 2 however, that a settlement conference is voluntary in this case. If Plaintiff chooses not to physically 3 appear at the settlement conference, the parties may conduct settlement discussion without the 4 involvement of the Court. Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff’s motion to appear at the settlement conference by video 5 6 conference or telephone is DENIED. 7 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 6, 2017 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 .

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?