Washington v. Garcia et al
Filing
40
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motion to Appear for the Settlement Conference By Video or Telephone 37 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/6/17. (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MICHAEL A. WASHINGTON,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
G. GARCIA, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:15-cv-01805-LJO-SAB (PC)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
APPEAR FOR THE SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE BY VIDEO OR TELEPHONE
[Doc. 37]
17
Plaintiff Michael A. Washington is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights
18
action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case is currently set for a settlement conference before the
19
undersigned on January 10, 2017.
20
On December 27, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting to appear at the settlement
21
conference by video or telephone. (Doc. 37.) For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s request will
22
be denied.
23
Generally, the Court allows inmates to appear telephonically for all pretrial proceedings. The
24
Court finds, however, that settlement conferences are not productive without the ability to have face to
25
face contact with the participants. As such, the Court requires parties to personally appear for
26
settlement conferences.
27
28
Plaintiff requests that he be allowed to appear by video conference or telephone. Due to
importance of face to face contact and issues that may arise with video conferencing and telephone
1
1
systems, the parties will be required to attend the settlement conference in person. The Court notes,
2
however, that a settlement conference is voluntary in this case. If Plaintiff chooses not to physically
3
appear at the settlement conference, the parties may conduct settlement discussion without the
4
involvement of the Court.
Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff’s motion to appear at the settlement conference by video
5
6
conference or telephone is DENIED.
7
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
January 6, 2017
/s/
Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?