Frye v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
20
FINAL JUDGMENT and ORDER Regarding Plaintiff's Social Security Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 2/16/17. (CASE CLOSED) (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CHRISTINE DALORIES FRYE,
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
14
Case No. 1:15-cv-01819-EPG
FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER
REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S SOCIAL
SECURITY COMPLAINT
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
15
Defendant.
16
17
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s complaint for judicial review of an
18
unfavorable decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration regarding her
19
application for supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits. The parties have
20
consented to entry of final judgment by the United States Magistrate Judge under the provisions
21
of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) with any appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. (ECF Nos. 6,
22
8.)
23
At the hearing on February 15, 2017, the Court heard from the parties and, having
24
reviewed the record, administrative transcript, the briefs of the parties, the applicable law, and
25
having heard oral argument, finds as follows:
26
For the reasons announced by the Court on the record at the conclusion of the parties’ oral
27
argument on February 15, 2017, the Court finds that the decision of the Commissioner of Social
28
Security should be reversed and the case should be remanded for further proceedings. The
1
1
Administrative Law Judge gave significant weight to the psychiatric evaluation of Plaintiff
2
conducted by Lance A. Portnoff, Ph.D., who determined that Plaintiff would have, among other
3
limitations: (1) “mild to moderate limitations in her ability to interact with coworkers [and] the
4
public”; (2) “moderate limitation in her ability to complete a normal workday or workweek
5
without interruptions from a psychiatric condition due to psychiatric symptoms”; and, (3)
6
moderate limitations in “[h]er ability to deal with work stress encountered in a competitive work
7
environment.”
8
The Administrative Law Judge found that Plaintiff had a residual functional capacity to
9
engage in “simple, routine tasks,” but this residual functional capacity determination does not
10
appear to encompass the above limitations, despite the fact that the Administrative Law Judge
11
appears to have adopted them. On remand, the Administrative Law Judge shall examine the
12
record with respect to the above limitations to determine whether they should be incorporated into
13
the Plaintiff’s residual functional capacity. If they should not be incorporated into the residual
14
functional capacity, the Administrative Law Judge should explain why. Alternatively, the
15
Administrative Law Judge may reformulate the residual functional capacity to include the
16
limitations and continue her analysis using the five step process.
17
Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s appeal from the administrative decision of
18
the Commissioner of Social Security and the case is remanded to the Social Security
19
Administration. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff
20
Christine Frye and against Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social
21
Security.
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
Dated:
February 16, 2017
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?