York v. Stewart et al

Filing 103

ORDER Requiring Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff's 102 Motion to Subpoena Non-Parties for Documents and Further Discovery signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 05/04/2020. Twenty-One Day Deadline. (Flores, E)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

REGINALD RAY YORK,

9

Plaintiff,

10
11

v.
G. GARCIA, et al.,

12

Defendants.

13

Case No. 1:15-cv-01828-DAD-BAM (PC)
ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
SUBPOENA NON-PARTIES FOR
DOCUMENTS AND FURTHER
DISCOVERY
(ECF No. 102)
TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE

14
15

Plaintiff Reginald Ray York (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil

16

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is currently set for a jury trial

17

commencing November 3, 2020 before District Judge Dale A. Drozd.

18

Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s renewed motion to subpoena non-parties for

19

documents and further discovery, filed April 30, 2020. (ECF No. 102.) The Court finds it

20

appropriate to obtain a response from Defendants regarding the motion. Accordingly, Defendants

21

shall file a response to Plaintiff’s motion within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of

22

this order. Plaintiff’s reply, if any, is due within seven (7) days from the date of service of

23

Defendants’ response.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25
26

Dated:

/s/ Barbara

May 4, 2020

A. McAuliffe

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28
1