York v. Stewart et al

Filing 52

ORDER Denying Defendants' Second 49 Motion to Modify Discovery and Scheduling Order as Moot, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 5/15/18. (Gonzalez, R)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
REGINALD RAY YORK,
8
Plaintiff,
9
v.
10
G. GARCIA, et al.,
11
Defendants.

12

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No.: 1:15-cv-01828-DAD-BAM (PC)
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’
SECOND MOTION TO MODIFY
DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER,
AS MOOT
[Doc. 49]

13

Currently before the Court is Defendants’ second motion to modify the discovery and

14

scheduling order, filed on May 9, 2018. (Doc. 49.) Defendants sought to modify the discovery

15

and scheduling order to postpone the June 22, 2018 discovery deadline and the July 23, 2018

16

dispositive motion deadline for sixty-days, pending the outcome of Defendants’ request for a

17

ruling pursuant to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision in Williams v. King, 875 F.3d 500

18

(9th Cir Nov. 9, 2017).

19

On May 14, 2018, the Court denied Defendants’ request for a ruling. Accordingly,

20

Defendants’ second motion to modify the discovery and scheduling order is HEREBY DENIED,

21

as moot.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

May 15, 2018

/s/ Barbara

A. McAuliffe

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE