York v. Stewart et al

Filing 56

ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to File Response to Defendants' Motion for Sanctions, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/21/18. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
REGINALD RAY YORK,
8
Plaintiff,
9
v.
10
G. GARCIA, et al.,
11
Defendants.

12
13
14

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No.: 1:15-cv-01828-DAD-BAM (PC)
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
FOR SANCTIONS
[Doc. 53]

Plaintiff Reginald Ray York is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

15

On May 21, 2018, Defendants filed a motion for an order terminating this action as a

16

sanction for Plaintiff’s failure to respond to discovery and comply with a court order. (Doc. 53.)

17

Pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion, if any, was due within

18

twenty-one (21) days of the date of service of that motion. That deadline has passed, and no

19

opposition or statement of non-opposition was filed.

20

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a response to Defendants’

21

motion for sanctions within thirty (30) days of this order. The failure to comply with this order

22

may result in a recommendation for sanctions, including dismissal of this action.

23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

June 21, 2018

/s/ Barbara

A. McAuliffe

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE