York v. Stewart et al

Filing 56

ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to File Response to Defendants' Motion for Sanctions, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/21/18. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 REGINALD RAY YORK, 8 Plaintiff, 9 v. 10 G. GARCIA, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 14 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No.: 1:15-cv-01828-DAD-BAM (PC) ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SANCTIONS [Doc. 53] Plaintiff Reginald Ray York is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 15 On May 21, 2018, Defendants filed a motion for an order terminating this action as a 16 sanction for Plaintiff’s failure to respond to discovery and comply with a court order. (Doc. 53.) 17 Pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion, if any, was due within 18 twenty-one (21) days of the date of service of that motion. That deadline has passed, and no 19 opposition or statement of non-opposition was filed. 20 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a response to Defendants’ 21 motion for sanctions within thirty (30) days of this order. The failure to comply with this order 22 may result in a recommendation for sanctions, including dismissal of this action. 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 21, 2018 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?