Dawson v. Commissioner of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al

Filing 25

ORDER for Defendants to Answer the Complaint Within Thirty Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 11/12/16.(Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ISAAC DA’BOUR DAWSON,

12
13
14
15

1:15-cv-01867-DAD-GSA-PC

Plaintiff,

ORDER FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER
THE COMPLAINT WITHIN THIRTY
DAYS

vs.
CDCR, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17
18
19

Isaac Da’Bour Dawson (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil

20

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds with the initial Complaint

21

filed on December 14, 2015, on Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment claim against Defendants

22

Johnson, Guzman, Gonzales and Sheldon, and First Amendment retaliation claim against

23

Defendants Guzman, Gonzales and Marsh. (ECF No. 1.)

24

On June 16, 2016, the Court granted Defendants an extension of time to respond to the

25

Complaint, until after a ruling on Defendants’ motion to revoke Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis

26

status. (ECF No. 17.) On November 8, 2016, the Court issued an order denying the motion to

27

revoke Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status. (ECF No. 24.) Therefore, Defendants shall now

28

file an Answer or other responsive pleading to the Complaint.
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Johnson, Guzman, Gonzales,

2

Sheldon, and Marsh shall file an Answer or other responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s Complaint,

3

within thirty days from the date of service of this order.

4
5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

November 12, 2016

/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2