Dawson v. Commissioner of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al

Filing 96

ORDER Re Defendant's Notice 95 ; ORDER Directing Clerk to Correct the Court's Record, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 10/25/2018: The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to correct the spelling of Defendant's name from Sheldon to "Shelton" on the court's record. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 ISAAC DA’BOUR DAWSON, 5 6 7 Plaintiff, v. BEARD, et al., 8 1:15-cv-01867-DAD-GSA-PC ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE (ECF No. 95.) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO CORRECT THE COURT'S RECORD Defendants. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Isaac Da’bour Dawson (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s initial Complaint filed on December 14, 2015, against defendants Correctional Officer (C/O) Johnson, C/O Guzman, Sergeant Gonzales, and C/O Sheldon (“Defendants”), on Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment claims for unreasonable unclothed body searches. (ECF No. 1.) On October 19, 2018, Defendants filed a notice informing the court that the correct spelling of Defendant Sheldon’s last name is “Shelton.” (ECF No. 95.) A review of the court’s record shows that this Defendant’s last name was entered on the court docket as “Sheldon.” 19 Pursuant to Rule 60(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Athe court may correct a 20 clerical mistake or a mistake arising from oversight or omission whenever one is found in a 21 judgment, order, or other part of the record.@ Fed. R. Civ. P 60(a). 22 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to correct the spelling of Defendant’s name from Sheldon to “Shelton” on the court’s record. 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 25, 2018 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?