Quiroga v. Medical Service Doctor et al

Filing 58

ORDER adopting 42 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS to deny Plaintiff's Motion for injunctive relief 33 signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/6/2017. (Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MONICO J. QUIROGA, III,

12
13
14
15
16

Case No. 1:15-cv-01871-LJO-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff,
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY PLAITIFF’S
MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

v.
MEDICAL SERVICE DOCTOR, et
al.,

(Docs. 33, 42)

Defendants.

17
18
Plaintiff, Monico J. Quiroga, III, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
19
pauperis in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On June 1, 2017, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations to deny
Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief. (Doc. 42.) This was served on Plaintiff that same day and
contained notice that any objections were to be filed within twenty-one days. (Id.) More than
two months have passed without Plaintiff filing any objections.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a
de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the
Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

28
1

1

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

3
4

the Findings and Recommendations, filed June 1, 2017 (Doc. 42), is adopted in
full; and

2.

5

Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief, filed on March 3, 2017 (Doc. 33) is
DENIED.

6
7
8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____

September 6, 2017

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2