Bell, et al. v. Rite Aid Corporation

Filing 40

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 1/16/18, ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees with respect to those claims. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 MATTHEW RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 121012) JOHN GLUGOSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 191551) MICHAEL RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 258541) RIGHETTI·GLUGOSKI, P.C. 456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 983-0900 Facsimile: (415) 397-9005 5 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Destrea Bell, Louis Serpa, and Agnes Marcallino 7 8 9 10 11 JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 96838) JUSTIN M. SCOTT (Cal. State Bar No. 302502) PAUL HASTINGS LLP 101 California Street San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 856-7000 Facsimile: (415) 856-7100 jeffwohl@paulhastings.com justinscott@paullhastings.com 12 13 Attorneys for Defendant Rite Aid Corporation 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 19 DESTREA BELL, LOUIS SERPA, and AGNES MARCALLINO, Plaintiffs, No. 1:15-CV-01872-JAM-EFB STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 20 vs. Judge: Hon. John A. Mendez Complaint Filed: FAC Filed: February 5, 2015 April 20, 2015 21 22 RITE AID CORPORATION, 23 Defendant. 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL U.S.D.C. E.D. CAL. NO. 1:15-CV-01872-JAM-EFB LEGAL_US_W # 92467436.1 1 Plaintiffs Louis Serpa and Agnes Marcallino and defendant Rite Aid Corporation, acting through 2 their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate that this action may be dismissed with prejudice 3 pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, each side to bear their own costs and 4 attorneys’ fees. 5 Dated: January 16, 2018. 6 MATTHEW RIGHETTI JOHN GLUGOSKI MICHAEL RIGHETTI RIGHETTI·GLUGOSKI, P.C. 7 By: /s/ Michael Righetti Michael Righetti Attorneys for Plaintiffs Destrea Bell, Louis Serpa, and Agnes Marcallino 8 9 10 11 Dated: January 16, 2018. 12 JEFFREY D. WOHL JUSTIN M. SCOTT PAUL HASTINGS LLP 13 By: /s/ Justin M. Scott Justin M. Scott Attorneys for Defendant Rite Aid Corporation 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL U.S.D.C. E.D. CAL. NO. 1:15-CV-01872-JAM-EFB LEGAL_US_W # 92467436.1 1 2 3 4 MATTHEW RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 121012) JOHN GLUGOSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 191551) MICHAEL RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 258541) RIGHETTI·GLUGOSKI, P.C. 456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 983-0900 Facsimile: (415) 397-9005 5 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Destrea Bell, Louis Serpa, and Agnes Marcallino 7 8 9 10 11 JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 96838) JUSTIN M. SCOTT (Cal. State Bar No. 302502) PAUL HASTINGS LLP 101 California Street San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 856-7000 Facsimile: (415) 856-7100 jeffwohl@paulhastings.com justinscott@paulhastings.com 12 13 Attorneys for Defendant Rite Aid Corporation 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 19 DESTREA BELL, LOUIS SERPA, and AGNES MARCALLINO, Plaintiffs, No. 1:15-CV-01872-JAM-EFB ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 20 vs. Judge: Hon. John A. Mendez Complaint Filed: FAC Filed: February 5, 2015 April 20, 2015 21 22 RITE AID CORPORATION, 23 Defendant. 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL U.S.D.C. E.D. CAL. NO. 1:15-CV-01872-JAM-EFB LEGAL_US_W # 92467436.1 1 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, 2 IT IS ORDERED that action be and hereby is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each side to 3 bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees with respect to those claims. 4 5 Dated: 1/16/2018 /s/ John A. Mendez__________ 6 7 Hon. John A. Mendez United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL U.S.D.C. E.D. CAL. NO. 1:15-CV-01872-JAM-EFB LEGAL_US_W # 92467436.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?