Bell, et al. v. Rite Aid Corporation
Filing
40
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 1/16/18, ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees with respect to those claims. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
MATTHEW RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 121012)
JOHN GLUGOSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 191551)
MICHAEL RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 258541)
RIGHETTI·GLUGOSKI, P.C.
456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 983-0900
Facsimile: (415) 397-9005
5
6
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Destrea Bell, Louis Serpa,
and Agnes Marcallino
7
8
9
10
11
JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 96838)
JUSTIN M. SCOTT (Cal. State Bar No. 302502)
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
101 California Street
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone:
(415) 856-7000
Facsimile:
(415) 856-7100
jeffwohl@paulhastings.com
justinscott@paullhastings.com
12
13
Attorneys for Defendant
Rite Aid Corporation
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18
19
DESTREA BELL, LOUIS SERPA,
and AGNES MARCALLINO,
Plaintiffs,
No. 1:15-CV-01872-JAM-EFB
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
20
vs.
Judge:
Hon. John A. Mendez
Complaint Filed:
FAC Filed:
February 5, 2015
April 20, 2015
21
22
RITE AID CORPORATION,
23
Defendant.
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
U.S.D.C. E.D. CAL. NO. 1:15-CV-01872-JAM-EFB
LEGAL_US_W # 92467436.1
1
Plaintiffs Louis Serpa and Agnes Marcallino and defendant Rite Aid Corporation, acting through
2
their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate that this action may be dismissed with prejudice
3
pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, each side to bear their own costs and
4
attorneys’ fees.
5
Dated: January 16, 2018.
6
MATTHEW RIGHETTI
JOHN GLUGOSKI
MICHAEL RIGHETTI
RIGHETTI·GLUGOSKI, P.C.
7
By: /s/ Michael Righetti
Michael Righetti
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Destrea Bell, Louis Serpa,
and Agnes Marcallino
8
9
10
11
Dated: January 16, 2018.
12
JEFFREY D. WOHL
JUSTIN M. SCOTT
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
13
By: /s/ Justin M. Scott
Justin M. Scott
Attorneys for Defendant
Rite Aid Corporation
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
U.S.D.C. E.D. CAL. NO. 1:15-CV-01872-JAM-EFB
LEGAL_US_W # 92467436.1
1
2
3
4
MATTHEW RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 121012)
JOHN GLUGOSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 191551)
MICHAEL RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 258541)
RIGHETTI·GLUGOSKI, P.C.
456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 983-0900
Facsimile: (415) 397-9005
5
6
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Destrea Bell, Louis Serpa,
and Agnes Marcallino
7
8
9
10
11
JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 96838)
JUSTIN M. SCOTT (Cal. State Bar No. 302502)
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
101 California Street
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone:
(415) 856-7000
Facsimile:
(415) 856-7100
jeffwohl@paulhastings.com
justinscott@paulhastings.com
12
13
Attorneys for Defendant
Rite Aid Corporation
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18
19
DESTREA BELL, LOUIS SERPA,
and AGNES MARCALLINO,
Plaintiffs,
No. 1:15-CV-01872-JAM-EFB
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE
20
vs.
Judge:
Hon. John A. Mendez
Complaint Filed:
FAC Filed:
February 5, 2015
April 20, 2015
21
22
RITE AID CORPORATION,
23
Defendant.
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL
U.S.D.C. E.D. CAL. NO. 1:15-CV-01872-JAM-EFB
LEGAL_US_W # 92467436.1
1
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor,
2
IT IS ORDERED that action be and hereby is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each side to
3
bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees with respect to those claims.
4
5
Dated: 1/16/2018
/s/ John A. Mendez__________
6
7
Hon. John A. Mendez
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL
U.S.D.C. E.D. CAL. NO. 1:15-CV-01872-JAM-EFB
LEGAL_US_W # 92467436.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?