United States v. Approximately $145,000.00 in U.S. Currency
Filing
8
Request and ORDER to (1) Continue Mandatory Schedule Conference and (2) Extend Filing Deadline for Joint Scheduling Report. (1) the mandatory schedulingconference is continued from April 5, 2016, at 8:30 a.m. to Monday, June 6, 2016, at 9:00 a.m. before Judge McAulilffe in Courtroom 8, and (2) the deadline to file a joint scheduling report is continued from March 29, 2016, to May 27, 2016. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 3/30/3016. (Herman, H)
5
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
JEFFREY A. SPIVAK
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Courthouse
2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401
Fresno, California 93721
(559) 497-4000 Telephone
(559) 497-4099 Facsimile
6
Attorneys for the United States
1
2
3
4
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
v.
APPROXIMATELY $145,000.00 IN U.S.
CURRENCY,
CASE NO. 1:15-CV-01890---BAM
REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO (1) CONTINUE MANDATORY
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND (2)
EXTEND FILING DEADLINE OF JOINT
SCHEDULING REPORT
15
Defendant.
16
17
The United States requests that the Court continue the mandatory scheduling
18
conference presently scheduling for April 5, 2016, at 8:30 a.m. to June 3, 2016, at 8:30 a.m. (or to a date the
19
Court deems appropriate), and extend the deadline to file a Joint Scheduling Report (“JSR”) from March 29,
20
2016, to May 27, 2016 (or to a date the Court deems appropriate). For the reasons set forth below, there is
21
good cause to continue the scheduling conference and the JSR filing deadline.
22
23
Introduction
On December 17, 2016, the United States filed a civil forfeiture complaint against the defendant
24
approximately $145,000.00 in U.S. Currency (“Defendant Currency”) based on its alleged involvement in
25
narcotics violations. All known potential claimants which potentially have an interest in the Defendant
26
Currency were served in a manner consistent with Dusenbery v. United States, 534 U.S. 161, 168 (2002) and
27
the applicable statutory authority. Additionally, public notice on the official internet government forfeiture
28
site, www.forfeiture.gov, began on March 5, 2016, and will run for thirty consecutive days, as required by
1
Rule G(4)(a)(iv)(C) of Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions.
2
Publication is expected to end on April 4, 2016.
On or about March 8, 2016, the United States sent copies of the Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In
3
4
Rem, Warrant of Arrest of Articles In Rem, Order Setting Mandatory Scheduling Conference, Order
5
Assigning Sacramento District Judge, Notice of Availability of a Magistrate Judge, Notice of Availability of
6
Voluntary Dispute Resolution, and notice of forfeiture letter dated March 8, 2016, to potential claimant Omar
7
Lopez Hernandez (“Hernandez”) at his last-known address located at 6331 Misty Way, Citrus Heights, CA
8
95621 by first class and certified mail.
On this same date, the United States sent copies of the above-referenced documents to Hernandez at
9
10
an alternate address of 11260 Coloma Road, Gold River, CA 95670 also by first class and certified mail.
11
The certified mail receipts have not yet been returned to the United States Attorney’s Office.
On March 8, 2016, the United States sent copies of the above-referenced documents to Irma
12
13
Cardenas at her last-known address of 11260 Coloma Road, Gold River, CA 95670 by first class and
14
certified mail. Irma Cardenas acknowledged receipt of the certified mail parcel. The signed certified receipt
15
(PS Form 3811) was received in the U.S. Attorney’s Office on March 14, 2016.
Good Cause
16
The deadline by which Omar Hernandez and Irma Cardenas must file a claim is April 12, 2016; one
17
18
week after the presently set Mandatory Scheduling Conference. Therefore, the United States requests that
19
the scheduling conference be continued to June 3, 2016, at 8:30 a.m. to allow the known and unknown
20
potential claimants to appear in this action and to allow the parties to meet and confer in advance of filing a
21
JSR. Thus, there is good cause to continue the mandatory scheduling conference and extend the JSR filing
22
deadline.
23
Dated: March 29, 2016
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
24
By: /s/ Jeffrey A. Spivak
JEFFREY A. SPIVAK
Assistant U.S. Attorney
25
26
27
///
28
///
1
ORDER
2
Pursuant to the United States’ request and good cause appearing: (1) the mandatory scheduling
3
conference is continued from April 5, 2016, at 8:30 a.m. to Monday, June 6, 2016, at 9:00 a.m. before
4
Judge McAulilffe in Courtroom 8, and (2) the deadline to file a joint scheduling report is continued from
5
March 29, 2016, to May 27, 2016.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated:
March 30, 2016
/s/ Barbara
A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?