Casey v. DNOW, L.P.

Filing 37

STIPULATION and ORDER to Continue Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendant's Rebuttal Expert Witness Disclosures, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/18/2017. (The hearing on Plaintiff's 34 Motion to Strike Defendant's Rebuttal Expert Witness Disclosures previously set for 2/7/2017, is CONTINUED to 3/7/2017, at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd.) (Gaumnitz, R)

5

KATHLEEN M. HARTMAN, Esq. (SBN 219934)
RANDY HY, Esq. (SBN 290395)
CALLAHAN, THOMPSON, SHERMAN
& CAUDILL, LLP
2601 Main Street, Suite 800
Irvine, California 92614
Tel
:
[phone]
Fax
:
[phone]
Email :
[e-mail]

6

Attorneys for Plaintiff LORI CASEY

1
2
3
4

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

LORI CASEY,

12
Plaintiff,
13
14

ASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES TO:
JUDGE DALE A. DROZD
COURTROOM 5
MAGISTRATE JUDGE JENNIFER L. THURSTON

vs.

15
16

CASE NO.: 1:15-CV-01899-DAD-JLT

DNOW, L.P., and Does 1-25,

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
STRIKE DEFENDANT’S REBUTTAL
EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURES

17
Defendants.
18
19

COMPLAINT FILED: 11/12/2015
TRIAL DATE:
07/10/2017
JOINT STIPULATION

20

On December 29, 2016, Plaintiff LORI CASEY (“Plaintiff”) filed a Motion to Strike

21

Defendant DNOW, L.P.’s (“Defendant”) Rebuttal Expert Witness Disclosures, to be heard on

22

February 1, 2017. On January 6, 2017, the Court continued the hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion to

23

February 7, 2017.

24

Both parties previously agreed to participate in private mediation with mediator Lisa

25

Klerman on February 15, 2017. After meeting and conferring with regard to Plaintiff’s Motion,

26

Plaintiff and Defendant (collectively, the “Parties”) have agreed to continue the hearing on

27

Plaintiff’s Motion until after completion of the mediation, so as to reserve the resources of the

28

Court and the Parties in the event that a successful settlement is reached during mediation.
-1-

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

THEREFORE, Plaintiff LORI CASEY and Defendant DNOW, L.P., by and through their
undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
1. The hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Defendant’s Rebuttal Expert Witness
Disclosures shall be continued to March 7, 2017.
2. This Joint Stipulation may be executed in counterparts. Facsimile or electronic signatures
shall have the same force and effect as originals.
SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.

8
9

DATED: January 18, 2017

10
11

CALLAHAN, THOMPSON, SHERMAN &
CAUDILL, LLP
By

12
13

/s/ Kathleen M. Hartman
KATHLEEN M. HARTMAN
RANDY HY
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LORI CASEY

14
15
16
17

DATED: January 18, 2017

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART, P.C.
By

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

/s/ Christian J. Keeney
CHRISTOPHER E. MOORE
CHRISTIAN J. KEENEY
NATALIE R. ALAMEDDINE
Attorneys for Defendant
DNOW, L.P.

1
2
3

ORDER
The Court, having reviewed and considered the foregoing Stipulation and finding good
cause therefore, ORDERS as follows:

4

The hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Defendant’s Rebuttal Expert Witness

5

Disclosures (Doc. 34) is continued to March 7, 2017, at 9:30 a.m. in courtroom 5 before District

6

Judge Dale A. Drozd.

7
8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

January 18, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-