Casey v. DNOW, L.P.

Filing 37

STIPULATION and ORDER to Continue Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendant's Rebuttal Expert Witness Disclosures, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/18/2017. (The hearing on Plaintiff's 34 Motion to Strike Defendant's Rebuttal Expert Witness Disclosures previously set for 2/7/2017, is CONTINUED to 3/7/2017, at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd.) (Gaumnitz, R)

Download PDF
5 KATHLEEN M. HARTMAN, Esq. (SBN 219934) RANDY HY, Esq. (SBN 290395) CALLAHAN, THOMPSON, SHERMAN & CAUDILL, LLP 2601 Main Street, Suite 800 Irvine, California 92614 Tel : (949) 261-2872 Fax : (949) 261-6060 Email : khartman@ctsclaw.com 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff LORI CASEY 1 2 3 4 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LORI CASEY, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 ASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES TO: JUDGE DALE A. DROZD COURTROOM 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE JENNIFER L. THURSTON vs. 15 16 CASE NO.: 1:15-CV-01899-DAD-JLT DNOW, L.P., and Does 1-25, STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT’S REBUTTAL EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURES 17 Defendants. 18 19 COMPLAINT FILED: 11/12/2015 TRIAL DATE: 07/10/2017 JOINT STIPULATION 20 On December 29, 2016, Plaintiff LORI CASEY (“Plaintiff”) filed a Motion to Strike 21 Defendant DNOW, L.P.’s (“Defendant”) Rebuttal Expert Witness Disclosures, to be heard on 22 February 1, 2017. On January 6, 2017, the Court continued the hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion to 23 February 7, 2017. 24 Both parties previously agreed to participate in private mediation with mediator Lisa 25 Klerman on February 15, 2017. After meeting and conferring with regard to Plaintiff’s Motion, 26 Plaintiff and Defendant (collectively, the “Parties”) have agreed to continue the hearing on 27 Plaintiff’s Motion until after completion of the mediation, so as to reserve the resources of the 28 Court and the Parties in the event that a successful settlement is reached during mediation. -1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 THEREFORE, Plaintiff LORI CASEY and Defendant DNOW, L.P., by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. The hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Defendant’s Rebuttal Expert Witness Disclosures shall be continued to March 7, 2017. 2. This Joint Stipulation may be executed in counterparts. Facsimile or electronic signatures shall have the same force and effect as originals. SO STIPULATED AND AGREED. 8 9 DATED: January 18, 2017 10 11 CALLAHAN, THOMPSON, SHERMAN & CAUDILL, LLP By 12 13 /s/ Kathleen M. Hartman KATHLEEN M. HARTMAN RANDY HY Attorneys for Plaintiff LORI CASEY 14 15 16 17 DATED: January 18, 2017 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. By 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- /s/ Christian J. Keeney CHRISTOPHER E. MOORE CHRISTIAN J. KEENEY NATALIE R. ALAMEDDINE Attorneys for Defendant DNOW, L.P. 1 2 3 ORDER The Court, having reviewed and considered the foregoing Stipulation and finding good cause therefore, ORDERS as follows: 4 The hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Defendant’s Rebuttal Expert Witness 5 Disclosures (Doc. 34) is continued to March 7, 2017, at 9:30 a.m. in courtroom 5 before District 6 Judge Dale A. Drozd. 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 18, 2017 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?