United States of America v. Gibson Wine Company
Filing
76
JOINT STIPULATION TO TERMINATE CONSENT DECREE AND REQUEST FOR COURT APPROVAL; ORDER THEREON signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 2/10/2021. Pursuant to the Stipulation of all parties, the Consent Decree in this case is TERMINATED. (Gonzales, V)
1
5
ANDREW W. INGERSOLL (CA Bar No. 221348)
Environmental Enforcement Section
Environment & Natural Resources Division
United States Department of Justice
P.O. Box 7611
Washington, DC 20044
(202) 514-1999
andrew.ingersoll@usdoj.gov
6
Attorney for the United States of America
2
3
4
7
8
9
10
11
JAMES T. DUFOUR, #113111
Dufour Law
819 F Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 553-3111
dufourlaw@dufourlegal.com
Attorney for Defendant Gibson Wine Co.
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
17
18
19
v.
GIBSON WINE CO.,
No. 1:15-CV-01900-AWI-SKO
JOINT STIPULATION TO TERMINATE
CONSENT DECREE AND REQUEST
FOR COURT APPROVAL; [PROPOSED]
ORDER THEREON
Defendant.
20
21
Plaintiff the United States of America on behalf of the United States Environmental
22
Protection Agency (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Gibson Wine Company (“Defendant”) respectfully
23
move the Court to terminate the Consent Decree entered as a final judgment in this matter on
24
March 13, 2018 (ECF No. 73).
25
In support of this motion, Plaintiff and Defendant hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
26
1.
27
The Consent Decree was negotiated by Plaintiff and Defendant to resolve alleged
violations of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401 et seq.; The Comprehensive Environmental
28
Case No. 1:15-CV-01900-AWI-SKO
1
Joint Stip. to Terminate Consent Decree and
Request for Court Approval; Order Thereon
1
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq.; and the Emergency
2
Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act, 42 U.S.C. § 11001 et seq.
3
4
5
2.
On March 13, 2018, the Court entered the Consent Decree as a final judgment in
this matter (ECF No. 73).
3.
Pursuant to Section V of the Consent Decree, Defendant completed the
6
compliance requirements of the Consent Decree and satisfied all claims for stipulated penalties
7
available pursuant to Section IX of the Consent Decree.
8
9
10
4.
In accordance with Paragraph 86 of the Consent Decree, Defendant requested
termination of the Consent Decree on the basis it had satisfied the requirements for termination.
5.
Pursuant to Paragraph 87 of the Consent Decree, after receiving Defendant’s
11
request for termination, Plaintiff agreed that Defendant has satisfied the requirements for
12
terminating the Consent Decree, except for the Consent Decree’s information retention and
13
destruction notification requirements, which survive for five (5) years after termination. See
14
Consent Decree ¶¶ 66 - 67.)
15
16
17
Accordingly, the Parties hereby stipulate to, and request that this Court enter an order on,
termination of the Consent Decree.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
18
FOR PLAINTIFF UNITED STATES OF
19
AMERICA:
20
21
Dated: February 10, 2021
22
23
24
25
26
/s/ Andrew W. Ingersoll
ANDREW W. INGERSOLL
(CA Bar No. 221348)
Environmental Enforcement Section
Environment & Natural Resources Division
United States Department of Justice
P.O. Box 7611
Washington, DC 20044
(202) 514-1999
andrew.ingersoll@doj.us.gov
27
28
Case No. 1:15-CV-01900-AWI-SKO
2
Joint Stip. to Terminate Consent Decree and
Request for Court Approval; Order Thereon
1
FOR DEFENDANT GIBSON WINE COMPANY:
2
3
Dated: February 10, 2021
4
5
6
/s/ James T. Dufour
JAMES T. DUFOUR, SBN 1113111
DUFOUR LAW
819 F Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 553-3111
dufourlaw@dufourlegal.com
7
8
9
10
ORDER
11
Pursuant to the Stipulation of all parties, the Consent Decree in this case is
12
TERMINATED.
13
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 10, 2021
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 1:15-CV-01900-AWI-SKO
3
Joint Stip. to Terminate Consent Decree and
Request for Court Approval; Order Thereon
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?