United States of America v. Gibson Wine Company

Filing 76

JOINT STIPULATION TO TERMINATE CONSENT DECREE AND REQUEST FOR COURT APPROVAL; ORDER THEREON signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 2/10/2021. Pursuant to the Stipulation of all parties, the Consent Decree in this case is TERMINATED. (Gonzales, V)

Download PDF
1 5 ANDREW W. INGERSOLL (CA Bar No. 221348) Environmental Enforcement Section Environment & Natural Resources Division United States Department of Justice P.O. Box 7611 Washington, DC 20044 (202) 514-1999 andrew.ingersoll@usdoj.gov 6 Attorney for the United States of America 2 3 4 7 8 9 10 11 JAMES T. DUFOUR, #113111 Dufour Law 819 F Street Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 553-3111 dufourlaw@dufourlegal.com Attorney for Defendant Gibson Wine Co. 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, 17 18 19 v. GIBSON WINE CO., No. 1:15-CV-01900-AWI-SKO JOINT STIPULATION TO TERMINATE CONSENT DECREE AND REQUEST FOR COURT APPROVAL; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON Defendant. 20 21 Plaintiff the United States of America on behalf of the United States Environmental 22 Protection Agency (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Gibson Wine Company (“Defendant”) respectfully 23 move the Court to terminate the Consent Decree entered as a final judgment in this matter on 24 March 13, 2018 (ECF No. 73). 25 In support of this motion, Plaintiff and Defendant hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 26 1. 27 The Consent Decree was negotiated by Plaintiff and Defendant to resolve alleged violations of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401 et seq.; The Comprehensive Environmental 28 Case No. 1:15-CV-01900-AWI-SKO 1 Joint Stip. to Terminate Consent Decree and Request for Court Approval; Order Thereon 1 Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq.; and the Emergency 2 Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act, 42 U.S.C. § 11001 et seq. 3 4 5 2. On March 13, 2018, the Court entered the Consent Decree as a final judgment in this matter (ECF No. 73). 3. Pursuant to Section V of the Consent Decree, Defendant completed the 6 compliance requirements of the Consent Decree and satisfied all claims for stipulated penalties 7 available pursuant to Section IX of the Consent Decree. 8 9 10 4. In accordance with Paragraph 86 of the Consent Decree, Defendant requested termination of the Consent Decree on the basis it had satisfied the requirements for termination. 5. Pursuant to Paragraph 87 of the Consent Decree, after receiving Defendant’s 11 request for termination, Plaintiff agreed that Defendant has satisfied the requirements for 12 terminating the Consent Decree, except for the Consent Decree’s information retention and 13 destruction notification requirements, which survive for five (5) years after termination. See 14 Consent Decree ¶¶ 66 - 67.) 15 16 17 Accordingly, the Parties hereby stipulate to, and request that this Court enter an order on, termination of the Consent Decree. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, 18 FOR PLAINTIFF UNITED STATES OF 19 AMERICA: 20 21 Dated: February 10, 2021 22 23 24 25 26 /s/ Andrew W. Ingersoll ANDREW W. INGERSOLL (CA Bar No. 221348) Environmental Enforcement Section Environment & Natural Resources Division United States Department of Justice P.O. Box 7611 Washington, DC 20044 (202) 514-1999 andrew.ingersoll@doj.us.gov 27 28 Case No. 1:15-CV-01900-AWI-SKO 2 Joint Stip. to Terminate Consent Decree and Request for Court Approval; Order Thereon 1 FOR DEFENDANT GIBSON WINE COMPANY: 2 3 Dated: February 10, 2021 4 5 6 /s/ James T. Dufour JAMES T. DUFOUR, SBN 1113111 DUFOUR LAW 819 F Street Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 553-3111 dufourlaw@dufourlegal.com 7 8 9 10 ORDER 11 Pursuant to the Stipulation of all parties, the Consent Decree in this case is 12 TERMINATED. 13 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 10, 2021 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 1:15-CV-01900-AWI-SKO 3 Joint Stip. to Terminate Consent Decree and Request for Court Approval; Order Thereon

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?