Birge et al v. Schwarzenegger et al

Filing 8

ORDER RELATING CASES AND REASSIGNING ACTION TO DISTRICT JUDGE LAWRENCE J. ONEILL AND MAGISTRATE JUDGE STANLEY A. BOONE signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/23/2015. The New Case Number is 1:15-cv-01901-LJO-SAB.(Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DEREK BIRGE, et al.,

12
13
14

Case No. 1:15-cv-01901-DAD-SKO

Plaintiffs,

New Case No. 1:15-cv-01901-LJO-SAB

v.

ORDER RELATING CASES AND
REASSIGNING ACTION TO DISTRICT
JUDGE LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL AND
MAGISTRATE JUDGE STANLEY A. BOONE

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

On December 19, 2015, Plaintiff filed this action alleging deliberate indifference in

18

violation of the Eighth Amendment.

(Doc. 1.)

The complaint generally alleges that the

19

defendants were deliberately indifferent by housing Plaintiff at Pleasant Valley State Prison due

20

to the prevalence of Valley Fever in the area.

21

A series of similar actions have been related and consolidated. Review of this action

22

reveals that it is related under Local Rule 123 to the actions entitled Bates v. Schwarzenegger,

23

1:14-cv-02085-LJO-SAB; Altamirano v. Schwarzenegger, 1:15-cv-00607-LJO-SAB; Alaniz v.

24

Schwarzenegger, 1:15-cv-01063-LJO-SAB; Aparicio v. Schwarzenegger, 1:15-cv-01369-LJO-

25

SAB. The actions are based on the same underlying facts and involve overlapping questions of

26

law and fact.

27

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

28

1.

The Office of the Clerk shall relate this case to Bates v. Schwarzenegger, 1:14-cv1

1

02085-LJO-SAB; Altamirano v. Schwarzenegger, 1:15-cv-00607-LJO-SAB;

2

Alaniz

3

Schwarzenegger, 1:15-cv-01369-LJO-SAB;

4

2.

5
6

v.

Schwarzenegger,

1:15-cv-01063-LJO-SAB;

and

Aparicio

v.

This case shall be assigned to the docket of District Judge Lawrence J. O’Neill and
reassigned to the docket of Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone;

3.

The new case number shall be:

7

1:15-cv-01901-LJO-SAB

8

and all future pleadings and/or correspondence must be so numbered. The parties

9

are advised that use of an incorrect case number, including initials, may result in a

10

delay of documents being processed and copies thereof being correctly distributed

11

and received by the appropriate judicial officer.

12
13
14

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

December 23, 2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2