Vaughn, Sr. v. Wegman et al
Filing
51
SECOND INFORMATIONAL ORDER notice and warning of requirements for opposing Defendant's 50 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 3/28/2018. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RAY LEE VAUGHN, Sr.,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
C. WEGMAN, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 1:15-cv-01902-LJO-JLT (PC)
SECOND INFORMATIONAL ORDER
NOTICE AND WARNING OF
REQUIREMENTS FOR OPPOSING
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(Doc. 50)
16
17
C. Wegman, filed a motion for summary judgment on March 21, 2018. (Doc. 50.)
18
Pursuant to Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012), Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th
19
Cir. 1998), and Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988), the Court notifies Plaintiff
20
of the rights and requirements to oppose the motion.
21
22
23
1. Unless otherwise ordered, all motions for summary judgment are briefed in accordance
with Local Rule 230(l).
2. Plaintiff is required to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to
24
Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Local Rule 230(l). If Plaintiff fails to file an
25
opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion, this action may be dismissed,
26
with prejudice, for failure to prosecute. The opposition or statement of non-opposition must be
27
filed not more than 21 days after the date of service of the motion. Id.
28
3. A motion for summary judgment is a request for judgment on some or all of Plaintiff’s
1
1
claims in favor of Defendant without trial. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a). Defendant’s motion sets forth
2
the facts which they contend are not reasonably subject to dispute and that entitle them to
3
judgment as a matter of law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). This is called the Statement of Undisputed
4
Facts. Local Rule 260(a).
5
Plaintiff has the right to oppose a motion for summary judgment. To oppose the motion,
6
Plaintiff must show proof of his claims. Plaintiff may agree with the facts set forth in
7
Defendant’s motion but argue that Defendant is not entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
8
If Plaintiff does not agree with the facts set forth in Defendant’s motion, Plaintiff may
9
show that Defendant’s facts are disputed in one or more of the following ways: (1) Plaintiff may
10
rely upon statements made under the penalty of perjury in the complaint or the opposition if (a)
11
the complaint or opposition shows that Plaintiff has personal knowledge of the matters stated and
12
(b) Plaintiff calls to the Court’s attention those parts of the complaint or opposition upon which
13
Plaintiff relies; (2) Plaintiff may serve and file declarations setting forth the facts which Plaintiff
14
believes prove his claims;1 (3) Plaintiff may rely upon written records but Plaintiff must prove
15
that the records are what he claims they are;2 or (4) Plaintiff may rely upon all or any part of the
16
transcript of one or more depositions, answers to interrogatories, or admissions obtained in this
17
proceeding. Should Plaintiff fail to contradict Defendant’s motion with declarations or other
18
evidence, Defendant’s evidence will be taken as truth, and final judgment may be entered without
19
a full trial. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e).
20
In opposing Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, Local Rule 260(b) requires
21
Plaintiff to reproduce Defendant’s itemized facts in the Statement of Undisputed Facts and admit
22
those facts which are undisputed and deny those which are disputed. If Plaintiff disputes (denies)
23
a fact, Plaintiff must cite to the evidence used to support that denial (e.g., pleading, declaration,
24
deposition, interrogatory answer, admission, or other document). Local Rule 260(b).
25
26
27
28
1
A declaration is a written statement setting forth facts (1) which are admissible in evidence, (2) which are
based on the personal knowledge of the person giving the statement, and (3) to which the person giving the statement
is competent to testify. 28 U.S.C. ' 1746; Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c)(4). A declaration must be dated and signed under
penalty of perjury as follows: “I declare (or certify, verify or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true
and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature).” 28 U.S.C. ' 1746.
2
Sworn or certified copies of all papers referred to in the declaration must be included and served on the
opposing party. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e).
2
1
4. If discovery has not yet been opened or if discovery is still open and Plaintiff is not yet
2
able to present facts to justify the opposition to the motion, the Court will consider a request to
3
postpone consideration of Defendant’s motion. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d). Any request to postpone
4
consideration of Defendant’s motion for summary judgment must include the following: (1) a
5
declaration setting forth the specific facts Plaintiff hopes to elicit from further discovery, (2) a
6
showing that the facts exist, and (3) a showing that the facts are essential to opposing the motion
7
for summary judgment. Blough v. Holland Realty, Inc., 574 F.3d 1084, 1091 n.5 (9th Cir. 2009);
8
Tatum v. City and County of San Francisco, 441 F.3d 1090, 1100-01 (9th Cir. 2006); State of
9
California v. Campbell, 138 F.3d 772, 779 (9th Cir. 1998). The request to postpone the motion
10
for summary judgment must identify what information is sought and how it would preclude
11
summary judgment. Blough, 574 F.3d at 1091 n.5; Tatum, 441 F.3d at 1100-01; Margolis v.
12
Ryan, 140 F.3d 850, 853 (9th Cir. 1998); Local Rule 260(b).
13
14
15
5. Unsigned declarations will be stricken, and declarations not signed under penalty of
perjury have no evidentiary value.
6. The failure of any party to comply with this order, the Federal Rules of Civil
16
Procedure, or the Local Rules of the Eastern District of California may result in the
17
imposition of sanctions including but not limited to dismissal of the action or entry of
18
default.
19
20
21
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
March 28, 2018
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?