Baca v. Biter

Filing 17

ORDER GRANTING 16 Motion to Void Issuance of Subpoenas Duces Tecum for Plaintiff's Medical Records at High Desert State Prison and ORDER DIRECTING United States Marshals to Void and Not Serve Subpoena to High Desert State Prison signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 4/27/2017. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 FRANK BACA , 11 12 13 14 CASE NO. 1:15-cv-01916-LJO-MJS (PC) Plaintiff, v. MARTIN BITER, et al., Defendants. 15 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO VOID ISSUANCE OF SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM FOR PLAINTIFF’S MEDICAL RECORDS AT HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON (ECF Nos. 15 & 16) UNITED STATES MARSHALS TO VOID SUBPOENA TO HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON 16 17 18 19 On April 25, 2017, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for the issuance of 20 subpoenas duces tecum for: 1) portions of Plaintiff’s medical record to and 2) a roster of 21 the Headquarters Utilization Management (“HUM”) Committee members, and directed 22 the United States Marshals Service to serve the requested subpoenas on the Litigation 23 Coordinator at High Desert State Prison (“HDSP”) and the Office of the CDCR Secretary, 24 respectively. (ECF No. 15.) 25 On April 26, 2017, Plaintiff’s counsel filed a declaration stating that HDSP had 26 recently produced what appeared to be Plaintiff’s entire medical record for Plaintiff’s 27 28 1 1 inspection. (Decl. of W. Schmidt (ECF No. 16) ¶ 4.) Plaintiff’s counsel states that a 2 subpoena for Plaintiff’s medical records is no longer necessary. (Id. ¶ 5.) 3 Accordingly, the subpoena for Plaintiff’s medical records, issued to HDSP, is 4 HEREBY VOIDED. The United States Marshals Service shall not serve the above- 5 described subpoena on HDSP. The subpoena for the HUM Committee roster directed to 6 the Office of the CDCR Secretary remains valid. 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 27, 2017 /s/ 10 Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?