Garcia v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
17
ORDER GRANTING 16 Defendant's Request for an Extension of Time to File a Response to Plaintiff's Opening Brief, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/26/2016. Responsive brief due by 11/4/2016. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
EDWARD GARCIA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
15
Defendant.
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:15-cv-1951-JLT
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
REQUEST AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S OPENING
BRIEF
On October 21, 2016, Defendant filed a stipulation of the parties to extend time for the
17
18
Commissioner to respond to Plaintiff’s opening brief. (Doc. 16) Notably, the Scheduling Order allows
19
for a single extension of thirty days by the stipulation of the parties (Doc. 5 at 4), which was previously
20
used by Plaintiff. (Docs. 11, 12) Beyond the single extension, “requests to modify [the scheduling]
21
order must be made by written motion and will be granted only for good cause.” (Doc. 5 at 4) Thus,
22
the Court construes the stipulation to be a motion to amend the Court’s scheduling order.
Defendant’s counsel, Jennifer Kenny, seeks an extension of four days to respond to Plaintiff’s
23
24
opening brief. (Doc. 16) She asserts the extension is necessary due to her “exceptionally heavy
25
workload and because …[she] will be out of the office on approved leave, including the day the
26
Opposition is currently due.” (Id. at 1) Plaintiff does not oppose the brief extension requested by
27
Defendant. (Id. at 1-2)
28
///
1
1
Good cause appearing, the Court ORDERS:
2
1.
Defendant’s request for an extension of time is GRANTED; and
3
2.
Defendant SHALL file a responsive brief on or before November 4, 2016.
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
October 26, 2016
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?