Block v. Hoban, et al.

Filing 9

STIPULATION and ORDER GRANTING the parties' request for a continuance of the Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for 4/7/2016 and CONTINUING it to 6/6/2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. Th e parties are to file a joint scheduling report no later than seven days prior to the date of the scheduling conference. The Court further continues the deadline for defendants to file a responsive pleading to 5/13/2016. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 3/10/2016. (Rooney, M)

Diane E. Coderniz #279458
1 BAKER MANOCK & JENSEN, PC
5260 North Palm Avenue, Fourth Floor
2 Fresno, California 93704
Telephone: [phone]
3 Facsimile: 559.432.5620
4
5

Attorneys for TERRY O. HOBAN and PATTI I. HOBAN

6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9
10

HENDRIK BLOCK,
Plaintiff,

11
v.

12

TERRY O. HOBAN, individually and dba
13 VALLEY BOWL; PATTI I. HOBAN,
individually and dba VALLEY BOWL;,
14
Defendants.
15

CASE No. 1:16-CV-000016-EPG
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND
DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE
RESPONSIVE PLEADING; ORDER
THEREON

16
WHEREAS, the parties in the above-captioned action are exploring a full and

17
18
19
20

complete settlement of this matter, and are cautiously optimistic that such a settlement can be
reached without the need for responsive pleadings to be filed or the holding of a scheduling
conference.
WHEREAS, the parties wish to avoid the unnecessary expenditure of attorneys’

21

22

fees and use of judicial resources while they exhaust their settlement efforts.
WHEREAS, the parties have not requested any prior extensions of time in this

23
24
25
26
27
28

action.
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff
HENDRIK BLOCK (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants TERRY O. HOBAN and PATTI I. HOBAN
(“Defendants”), by and through their respective counsel, that due to the ongoing settlement
negotiations, the Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for April 7, 2016 be continued to a
1792644v1 / 19748.0001

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO
FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING; [PROPOSED] ORDER

1 date and time at the Court’s convenience on or after June 1, 2016, subject to Court approval.
2

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and Defendants, by and

3 through their respective counsel, that the deadline for Defendants to file a responsive pleading,
4 currently set for March 14, 2016, be continued to May 13, 2016, subject to Court approval,
5 pursuant to Rule 6 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 144.
6

DATED: March 9, 2016
BAKER MANOCK & JENSEN, PC

7
8

By: /s/ Diane E. Coderniz
Diane E. Coderniz
Attorneys for TERRY O. HOBAN and
PATTI I. HOBAN

9
10
11

DATED: March 9, 2016
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

12
13

By: /s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorneys for HENDRIK BLOCK

14
15

ORDER

16

The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,

17

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the scheduling conference currently set for April

18
19
20
21

7, 2016 in the above-captioned case is continued to June 6, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 10 of
the above-captioned court. The Parties are to file a Joint Scheduling Report no later than seven
days prior to the date of the scheduling conference.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for Defendants to file a responsive

22
23
24

pleading is continued until May 13, 2016.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26

Dated:

March 10, 2016

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28

1792644v1 / 19748.0001

2

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO
FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING; [PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1792644v1 / 19748.0001

3

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO
FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING; [PROPOSED] ORDER