J-Weial v. Lizarraga

Filing 30

ORDER Regarding Petitioner's 29 Motion for Clarification, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 05/27/2016. (Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

XAVIER LUMAR J’WEIAL,

8

Petitioner,

9
10

No. 1:16-cv-00044-SKO HC
ORDER REGARDING PETITIONER’S
MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION

v.
JOE LIZARRAGA, Warden,
(Doc. 29)

11

Respondent.

12
On May 25, 2016, Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of

13
14

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, submitted an ambiguous motion to which he had

15

attached various proofs of service. The Court is not certain what information or relief Petitioner

16

seeks. To the extent that Petitioner is unclear regarding the status of his petition, a review of the

17

docket indicates that, but for Respondent’s reply to Petitioner’s traverse, which is to be filed on or

18

before June 15, 2016, briefing in the above-captioned case is complete. Upon Respondent’s filing

19

of his reply, the Court will take the matter under submission.

20
21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

May 27, 2016

/s/

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

23
24
25
26
27
28
1

.