Rivera-Martinez et al v. Kern County et al
Filing
23
ORDER GRANTING Defendant Dr. Hayden to file his amended answer within 5 days, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/19/2016. (Kusamura, W)
5
Andrew R. Weiss #95567
Carol A. O’Neil #71282
WEISS MARTIN SALINAS & HEARST
A Professional Corporation
7108 North Fresno Street, Suite 250
Fresno, California 93720
Telephone: (559) 438-2080
Facsimile: (559) 438-8363
6
Attorneys for Defendant Philip Hyden, M.D.
1
2
3
4
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
CYNTHIA RIVERA-MARTINEZ and
ARTURO MARTINEZ,
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
KERN COUNTY; KERN COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES; )
)
SOCIAL WORKER STEPHANIE MEEK,
)
individually; PHILIP HYDEN, M.D.,
)
individually; and DOES 1 through 100,
)
inclusive,
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 1:16-CV-00062---JLT
WRITTEN CONSENT OF PLAINTIFFS
CYNTHIA RIVERA-MARTINEZ AND
ARTURO MARTINEZ AND CODEFENDANTS KERN COUNTY, KERN
COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN
RESOURCES AND SOCIAL WORKER
STEPHANIE MEEK TO THE FILING OF
DEFENDANT PHILIP HYDEN, M.D’S
(PROPOSED) FIRST AMENDED
ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT AND COURT
ORDER THEREON
(Doc. 22)
24
25
Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 15 (2) which allows for amendment of
26
a party’s pleadings before trial with the other parties’ written consent and for the sake of
27
preserving precious judicial resources that would be consumed if a motion for leave to amend
28
were made, Defendant, PHILIP HYDEN (“Dr. Hyden”), respectfully submits this stipulation in
1
WRITTEN CONSENT TO PERMIT FILING OF DEFENDANT PHILIP HYDEN, M.D.’S FIRST AMENDED ANSWER TO
PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND ORDER THEREON
1
which Plaintiffs CYNTHIA RIVERA-MARTINEZ and ARTURO MARTINEZ and Co-
2
Defendants KERN COUNTY, KERN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
3
and SOCIAL WORKER STEPHANIE MEEK, by and through their respective counsel of
4
record, hereby consent in writing to the filing of Dr. Hyden’s (Proposed) First Amended Answer
5
to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as
6
Exhibit “A.”
Dated: August 18, 2016
7
LACK LAW GROUP, APC
8
By:
/s/ Rebecca D. Lack (electronic signature
use authorized on August 17, 2016)
Rebecca D. Lack
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Cynthia Rivera-Martinez and
Arturo Martinez
9
10
11
12
13
Dated: August 18, 2016
COUNTY OF KERN, COUNTY COUNSEL
14
By:
/s/ Kathleen Rivera (electronic signature
use authorized on August 17, 2016)
Theresa A. Goldner, County Counsel
By: Kathleen Rivera, Deputy
Attorneys for Defendants
Kern County, Kern County Department of
Human Services and Social Worker
Stephanie Meek
15
16
17
18
19
20
Dr. Hyden requests that this court issue the order below based on the above
21
written consents of the respective counsel for Plaintiffs and Co-Defendants. Attached hereto as
22
Exhibit B are true and correct copies of emails in which attorneys, Rebecca Lack and Kathleen
23
Rivera, have authorized the use of their electronic signatures on this written consent
24
.
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
2
WRITTEN CONSENT TO PERMIT FILING OF DEFENDANT PHILIP HYDEN, M.D.’S FIRST AMENDED ANSWER TO
PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND ORDER THEREON
1
///
2
Dated: August 19, 2016
3
WEISS MARTIN SALINAS & HEARST
A Professional Corporation
4
5
By:
6
7
/s/ Carol A. O’Neil
Andrew R. Weiss
Carol A. O’Neil
Attorneys for Defendant
Philip Hyden, M.D.
8
9
ORDER
10
11
12
13
Based on the stipulation of the parties, the Court ORDERS that defendant, Dr. Hyden,
may file his first amended answer within five days.
14
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
August 19, 2016
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
WRITTEN CONSENT TO PERMIT FILING OF DEFENDANT PHILIP HYDEN, M.D.’S FIRST AMENDED ANSWER TO
PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND ORDER THEREON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?