Rivera-Martinez et al v. Kern County et al

Filing 23

ORDER GRANTING Defendant Dr. Hayden to file his amended answer within 5 days, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/19/2016. (Kusamura, W)

Download PDF
5 Andrew R. Weiss #95567 Carol A. O’Neil #71282 WEISS MARTIN SALINAS & HEARST A Professional Corporation 7108 North Fresno Street, Suite 250 Fresno, California 93720 Telephone: (559) 438-2080 Facsimile: (559) 438-8363 6 Attorneys for Defendant Philip Hyden, M.D. 1 2 3 4 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 CYNTHIA RIVERA-MARTINEZ and ARTURO MARTINEZ, ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) KERN COUNTY; KERN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES; ) ) SOCIAL WORKER STEPHANIE MEEK, ) individually; PHILIP HYDEN, M.D., ) individually; and DOES 1 through 100, ) inclusive, ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:16-CV-00062---JLT WRITTEN CONSENT OF PLAINTIFFS CYNTHIA RIVERA-MARTINEZ AND ARTURO MARTINEZ AND CODEFENDANTS KERN COUNTY, KERN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES AND SOCIAL WORKER STEPHANIE MEEK TO THE FILING OF DEFENDANT PHILIP HYDEN, M.D’S (PROPOSED) FIRST AMENDED ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND COURT ORDER THEREON (Doc. 22) 24 25 Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 15 (2) which allows for amendment of 26 a party’s pleadings before trial with the other parties’ written consent and for the sake of 27 preserving precious judicial resources that would be consumed if a motion for leave to amend 28 were made, Defendant, PHILIP HYDEN (“Dr. Hyden”), respectfully submits this stipulation in 1 WRITTEN CONSENT TO PERMIT FILING OF DEFENDANT PHILIP HYDEN, M.D.’S FIRST AMENDED ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND ORDER THEREON 1 which Plaintiffs CYNTHIA RIVERA-MARTINEZ and ARTURO MARTINEZ and Co- 2 Defendants KERN COUNTY, KERN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES 3 and SOCIAL WORKER STEPHANIE MEEK, by and through their respective counsel of 4 record, hereby consent in writing to the filing of Dr. Hyden’s (Proposed) First Amended Answer 5 to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as 6 Exhibit “A.” Dated: August 18, 2016 7 LACK LAW GROUP, APC 8 By: /s/ Rebecca D. Lack (electronic signature use authorized on August 17, 2016) Rebecca D. Lack Attorneys for Plaintiffs Cynthia Rivera-Martinez and Arturo Martinez 9 10 11 12 13 Dated: August 18, 2016 COUNTY OF KERN, COUNTY COUNSEL 14 By: /s/ Kathleen Rivera (electronic signature use authorized on August 17, 2016) Theresa A. Goldner, County Counsel By: Kathleen Rivera, Deputy Attorneys for Defendants Kern County, Kern County Department of Human Services and Social Worker Stephanie Meek 15 16 17 18 19 20 Dr. Hyden requests that this court issue the order below based on the above 21 written consents of the respective counsel for Plaintiffs and Co-Defendants. Attached hereto as 22 Exhibit B are true and correct copies of emails in which attorneys, Rebecca Lack and Kathleen 23 Rivera, have authorized the use of their electronic signatures on this written consent 24 . 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 2 WRITTEN CONSENT TO PERMIT FILING OF DEFENDANT PHILIP HYDEN, M.D.’S FIRST AMENDED ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND ORDER THEREON 1 /// 2 Dated: August 19, 2016 3 WEISS MARTIN SALINAS & HEARST A Professional Corporation 4 5 By: 6 7 /s/ Carol A. O’Neil Andrew R. Weiss Carol A. O’Neil Attorneys for Defendant Philip Hyden, M.D. 8 9 ORDER 10 11 12 13 Based on the stipulation of the parties, the Court ORDERS that defendant, Dr. Hyden, may file his first amended answer within five days. 14 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 19, 2016 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 WRITTEN CONSENT TO PERMIT FILING OF DEFENDANT PHILIP HYDEN, M.D.’S FIRST AMENDED ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND ORDER THEREON

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?