Sorrells v. United States Marshals Service et al

Filing 51

ORDER Re-Setting Deadline to File Exhaustion Motion and Extending all other Deadlines set forth in the Court's 42 Order, dated March 14, 2017 to Defendant Horton as well as Defendant Melhoff; ORDERED that the deadline for both Defendants to file Exhaustion Motion be extended to July 14, 2017 and all other deadlines set forth in the Court's March 14, 2017, remain in full force and effect, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 05/25/2017. (Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

SHANNON SORRELLS,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

v.
HORTON, et al.,
Defendants.

16

a serious medical need in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.
On March 13, 2017, Defendant Melhoff filed a notice of waiver of answer and demand for jury
trial. On March 14, 2017, the Court issued the discovery and scheduling order.
On May 23, 2017, Defendant Horton filed a notice of waiver of answer and demand for jury

23
24
25

[ECF No. 42]

This action is proceeding against Defendants Horton and Melhoff for deliberate indifference to

21
22

ORDER RE-SETTING DEADLINE TO FILE
EXHAUSTION MOTION AND EXTENDING
ALL OTHER DEADLINES SET FORTH IN THE
COURT’S MARCH 14, 2017, TO DEFENDANT
HORTON AS WELL AS DEFENDANT MELHOFF

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

19
20

Case No.: 1:16-cv-00081-DAD-SAB (PC)

Plaintiff Shannon Sorrells is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action

17
18

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

trial.
Inasmuch as Defendant Horton filed a waiver of answer after the issuance of the discovery and

26

scheduling order, the Court will re-set the deadline to file an exhaustion motion, and extend all other

27

deadlines set forth in the Court’s March 14, 2017, to Defendant Horton and well as Defendant

28

Melhoff.
1

1

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

3

2017; and

4

2.

5

The deadline for both Defendants to file an exhaustion motion is extended to July 14,

All other deadlines and provisions set forth in the Court’s March 14, 2017, remain in

full force and effect as to both Defendants.

6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8

Dated:

9

May 25, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2