Johnson v. Cotta et al

Filing 22

ORDER DENYING 21 Plaintiff's Motion for Rehearing signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/28/2017. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ARMAH JOHNSON, 12 No. 1:16-cv-00082-DAD-JLT Plaintiff, 13 14 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR REHEARING v. J. COTTA, et al., 15 (Doc. No. 21) Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, Armah Johnson, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed 18 this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on January 20, 2016. (Doc. No. 1.) 19 However, on July 27, 2016, the action was dismissed after this court concluded it lacked 20 jurisdiction since plaintiff’s claims of the unauthorized deprivation of his property by prison 21 officials failed to state a cognizable due process claim. (Doc. No. 17 at 2–3.) 22 On January 13, 2017, plaintiff filed a “motion for rehearing.” (Doc. No. 21.) In his 23 motion, plaintiff states a rehearing is necessary because “the state failed to provide meaningful 24 post deprivity [sic] remedy for loss occasion by intentional official misconduct.” (Id.) While not 25 entirely clear, the court takes this to mean plaintiff was unsuccessful in seeking redress in the 26 state courts. Even if this were the case, however, it would provide no cause for this court to 27 reconsider its prior determination that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over plaintiff’s claims. 28 Bianchi v. Rylaarsdam, 334 F.3d 895, 898 (9th Cir. 2003) (“[F]ederal courts lack jurisdiction to 1 1 hear appeals from state court decisions.”). No other grounds are advanced by plaintiff in his 2 motion as to why this court should revisit its decision, which it has already declined to do once. 3 (See Doc. No. 20.) 4 Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion for rehearing (Doc. No. 21) is denied. No other orders 5 will issue in response to filings made by plaintiff in this closed case. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: April 28, 2017 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?