Johnson v. Cotta et al
Filing
22
ORDER DENYING 21 Plaintiff's Motion for Rehearing signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/28/2017. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ARMAH JOHNSON,
12
No. 1:16-cv-00082-DAD-JLT
Plaintiff,
13
14
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR REHEARING
v.
J. COTTA, et al.,
15
(Doc. No. 21)
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, Armah Johnson, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed
18
this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on January 20, 2016. (Doc. No. 1.)
19
However, on July 27, 2016, the action was dismissed after this court concluded it lacked
20
jurisdiction since plaintiff’s claims of the unauthorized deprivation of his property by prison
21
officials failed to state a cognizable due process claim. (Doc. No. 17 at 2–3.)
22
On January 13, 2017, plaintiff filed a “motion for rehearing.” (Doc. No. 21.) In his
23
motion, plaintiff states a rehearing is necessary because “the state failed to provide meaningful
24
post deprivity [sic] remedy for loss occasion by intentional official misconduct.” (Id.) While not
25
entirely clear, the court takes this to mean plaintiff was unsuccessful in seeking redress in the
26
state courts. Even if this were the case, however, it would provide no cause for this court to
27
reconsider its prior determination that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over plaintiff’s claims.
28
Bianchi v. Rylaarsdam, 334 F.3d 895, 898 (9th Cir. 2003) (“[F]ederal courts lack jurisdiction to
1
1
hear appeals from state court decisions.”). No other grounds are advanced by plaintiff in his
2
motion as to why this court should revisit its decision, which it has already declined to do once.
3
(See Doc. No. 20.)
4
Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion for rehearing (Doc. No. 21) is denied. No other orders
5
will issue in response to filings made by plaintiff in this closed case.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
Dated:
April 28, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?