McRoberts v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
21
STIPULATION and ORDER FOR THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 8/26/2017. (Kusamura, W)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
FRESNO DIVISION
5
6
7
8
JASON DANIEL McROBERTS,
9
Plaintiff,
10
v.
11
12
13
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil No. 1:16-cv-00086-GSA
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE
AWARD AND PAYMENT OF
ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES
PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS
TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d),
AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §
1920
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned
counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Jason McRoberts be awarded attorney fees
and expenses in the amount of Four Thousand Seven Hundred dollars ($4,700) under the Equal
Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and costs in the amount of Four Hundred
dollars ($400) under 28 U.S.C. § 1920. This amount represents compensation for all legal
services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in
accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920; 2412(d).
After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Jason McRoberts, the government will
consider the matter of Jason McRoberts’s assignment of EAJA fees to James Pi. Pursuant to
Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2529 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend
on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the
Treasury’s Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will
determine whether they are subject to any offset.
1
1
Fees shall be made payable to Jason McRoberts, but if the Department of the Treasury
2
determines that Jason McRoberts does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause
3
the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to James Pi, pursuant to the
4
assignment executed by Jason McRoberts. Any payments made shall be delivered to James Pi.
5
This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Jason McRoberts’s request for
6
EAJA attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant
7
under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete
8
release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Jason McRoberts and/or James Pi including
9
Binder and Binder may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action.
10
This award is without prejudice to the rights of James Pi and/or Binder and Binder to
11
seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause
12
provisions of the EAJA.
13
14
Respectfully submitted,
15
Dated: August 23, 2017
LAW OFFICES OF BINDER AND BINDER
16
By:
17
18
/s/ James Pi
JAMES PI
Attorney for Plaintiff.
19
20
Dated: August 23, 2017
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
21
22
23
24
By:
/s/ Michael K. Marriott*
MICHAEL K. MARRIOTT
* By email authorization on August 22, 2017
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
25
26
27
28
2
1
2
ORDER
Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees and expenses in the amount of four thousand
3
seven hundred dollars ($4,700) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. §
4
2412(d), and costs in the amount of Four Hundred dollars ($400) under 28 U.S.C. § 1920.
5
Payment shall be made pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2529 (2010), and in
6
accordance with the terms outlined in the above stipulation.
7
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
August 26, 2017
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?