Tarango v. City of Bakersfield
Filing
31
ORDER GRANTING 30 Stipulation to Continue Pretrial Conference Date; ORDER SETTING Some Pretrial Dates, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/19/2017. Pretrial Conference CONTINUED to 7/7/2017 at 08:30 AM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Joint pretrial conference statement due by 6/30/2017. Motions in limine filed by 7/14/2017. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
EMILIO TARANGO,
12
13
14
Case No.: 1:16-CV-00099 JLT
Plaintiff,
vs.
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD,
15
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO
CONTINUE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
DATE; ORDER SETTING SOME
PRETRIAL DATES
(Doc. 30)
Defendant.
16
17
18
Based upon the stipulation of counsel, the Court ORDERS:
19
1.
The pretrial conference is CONTINUED to July 7, 2017 at 8:30 a.m.;
20
2.
In advance of the pretrial conference, the Court sets the following deadlines:
a.
21
22
No later than June 30, 2017, the parties SHALL file a joint pretrial
conference statement addressing the requirements of Local Rule 281(b);
b.
23
No later than June 26, 2015, the parties SHALL exchange exhibit lists
24
via e-mail or fax. A copy of any exhibit not previously disclosed, SHALL be provided with the
25
exhibit list;
26
c.
27
via e-mail or fax;
28
d.
No later than June 26, 2015, the parties SHALL exchange witness lists
Any party may file motions in limine. The purpose of a motion in limine
1
is to establish in advance of the trial that certain evidence should not be offered at trial.
2
“Although the Federal Rules of Evidence do not explicitly authorize in limine rulings, the
3
practice has developed pursuant to the district court’s inherent authority to manage the course of
4
trials.” Luce v. United States, 469 U.S. 38, 40 n. 2 (1984); Jonasson v. Lutheran Child and
5
Family Services, 115 F. 3d 436, 440 (7th Cir. 1997). The Court will grant a motion in limine,
6
and thereby bar use of the evidence in question, only if the moving party establishes that the
7
evidence clearly is not admissible for any valid purpose. Id.
8
Any motions in limine must be filed with the Court no later than July 14, 2017. The
9
motion must clearly identify the nature of the evidence that the moving party seeks to prohibit
10
the other side from offering at trial. Any opposition to the motion must be served on the other
11
party, and filed with the Court by July 28, 2017. No replies are authorized. The Court sets a
12
hearing on the motions in limine on August 4, 2017, at 9:30 a.m. Counsel may appear by
13
teleconference by dialing (888) 557-8511 and entering Access Code 1652736 provided they
14
provide notice of their intent to appear by telephone to SHALL@caed.uscourts.gov at least five
15
days in advance of the hearing.
16
In advance of filing any motion in limine, counsel SHALL meet and confer to determine
17
whether they can resolve any disputes and avoid filing motions in limine. Along with their
18
motions in limine, the parties SHALL file a certification demonstrating counsel have in
19
good faith met and conferred and attempted to resolve the dispute. Failure to provide the
20
certification may result in the Court refusing to entertain the motion;
21
e.
The parties SHALL serve, via e-mail or fax, their proposed jury
22
instructions in accordance with Local Rule 163 and their proposed verdict form on one another
23
no later than August 4, 2017. The parties shall conduct a conference to address their proposed
24
jury instructions and verdict form no later than July 21, 2017. At the conference, the parties
25
SHALL attempt to reach agreement on jury instructions and verdict form for use at trial.
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
June 19, 2017
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?