Tarango v. City of Bakersfield

Filing 31

ORDER GRANTING 30 Stipulation to Continue Pretrial Conference Date; ORDER SETTING Some Pretrial Dates, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/19/2017. Pretrial Conference CONTINUED to 7/7/2017 at 08:30 AM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Joint pretrial conference statement due by 6/30/2017. Motions in limine filed by 7/14/2017. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EMILIO TARANGO, 12 13 14 Case No.: 1:16-CV-00099 JLT Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, 15 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE DATE; ORDER SETTING SOME PRETRIAL DATES (Doc. 30) Defendant. 16 17 18 Based upon the stipulation of counsel, the Court ORDERS: 19 1. The pretrial conference is CONTINUED to July 7, 2017 at 8:30 a.m.; 20 2. In advance of the pretrial conference, the Court sets the following deadlines: a. 21 22 No later than June 30, 2017, the parties SHALL file a joint pretrial conference statement addressing the requirements of Local Rule 281(b); b. 23 No later than June 26, 2015, the parties SHALL exchange exhibit lists 24 via e-mail or fax. A copy of any exhibit not previously disclosed, SHALL be provided with the 25 exhibit list; 26 c. 27 via e-mail or fax; 28 d. No later than June 26, 2015, the parties SHALL exchange witness lists Any party may file motions in limine. The purpose of a motion in limine 1 is to establish in advance of the trial that certain evidence should not be offered at trial. 2 “Although the Federal Rules of Evidence do not explicitly authorize in limine rulings, the 3 practice has developed pursuant to the district court’s inherent authority to manage the course of 4 trials.” Luce v. United States, 469 U.S. 38, 40 n. 2 (1984); Jonasson v. Lutheran Child and 5 Family Services, 115 F. 3d 436, 440 (7th Cir. 1997). The Court will grant a motion in limine, 6 and thereby bar use of the evidence in question, only if the moving party establishes that the 7 evidence clearly is not admissible for any valid purpose. Id. 8 Any motions in limine must be filed with the Court no later than July 14, 2017. The 9 motion must clearly identify the nature of the evidence that the moving party seeks to prohibit 10 the other side from offering at trial. Any opposition to the motion must be served on the other 11 party, and filed with the Court by July 28, 2017. No replies are authorized. The Court sets a 12 hearing on the motions in limine on August 4, 2017, at 9:30 a.m. Counsel may appear by 13 teleconference by dialing (888) 557-8511 and entering Access Code 1652736 provided they 14 provide notice of their intent to appear by telephone to SHALL@caed.uscourts.gov at least five 15 days in advance of the hearing. 16 In advance of filing any motion in limine, counsel SHALL meet and confer to determine 17 whether they can resolve any disputes and avoid filing motions in limine. Along with their 18 motions in limine, the parties SHALL file a certification demonstrating counsel have in 19 good faith met and conferred and attempted to resolve the dispute. Failure to provide the 20 certification may result in the Court refusing to entertain the motion; 21 e. The parties SHALL serve, via e-mail or fax, their proposed jury 22 instructions in accordance with Local Rule 163 and their proposed verdict form on one another 23 no later than August 4, 2017. The parties shall conduct a conference to address their proposed 24 jury instructions and verdict form no later than July 21, 2017. At the conference, the parties 25 SHALL attempt to reach agreement on jury instructions and verdict form for use at trial. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 19, 2017 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?