Fowler Packing Company, Inc. et al v. Lanier et al
Filing
52
STIPULATION and ORDER to continue Scheduling Conference to 5/31/2017 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. A Joint Scheduling report is due one week before the conference date. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/4/2017. (Hernandez, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
XAVIER BECERRA, State Bar No. 118517
Attorney General of California
MARK R. BECKINGTON, State Bar No. 126009
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
THOMAS M. PATTON, State Bar No. 162664
Deputy Attorney General
1300 I Street, Suite 125
P.O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Telephone: (916) 445-1685
Fax: (916) 324-8835
E-mail: Tom.Patton@doj.ca.gov
Attorneys for David M. Lanier,
Christine Baker, and Julie A. Su
8
9
10
11
12
13
IRELL & MANELLA LLP
David A. Schwarz (Cal. Bar No. 159376)
dschwarz@irell.com
1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900
Los Angeles, California 90067-4276
Telephone: (310) 277-1010
Facsimile: (310) 203-7199
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Fowler Packing Company, Inc. and
Gerawan Farming, Inc.
14
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – FRESNO DIVISION
16
17
18
19
FOWLER PACKING COMPANY, INC.;
GERAWAN FARMING, INC.,
20
1:16-cv-00106-DAD-SAB
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE
Plaintiffs, SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
21
v.
22
23
24
25
26
DAVID M. LANIER, in his official capacity
as Secretary of the California Labor and
Workforce Development Agency;
CHRISTINE BAKER, in her official
capacity as the Director of the Department
of Industrial Relations; JULIE A. SU, in her
official capacity as California Labor
Commissioner,
27
Defendants.
28
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Pursuant to Local Rule 144, plaintiffs Fowler Packing Company, Inc. and Gerawan
Farming, Inc., and defendants David M. Lanier, Christine Baker, and Julie A. Su, hereby stipulate
and agree to reset the Scheduling Conference in this matter as set forth below.
WHEREAS the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its Mandate on March 28, 2017, in
case 16-16236, thereby effecting the remand of this matter to the United States District Court;
WHEREAS the Honorable Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone thereafter issued a Minute
Order on March 30, 2017, setting this matter for a Scheduling Conference on April 27, 2017;
WHEREAS counsel for Defendants had previously scheduled personal time off and had
arranged to be out of state and unavailable from April 14 to April 30;
WHEREAS, counsel for Defendants has been apprised that Magistrate Judge Boone’s
calendar would allow the Scheduling Conference to be held Wednesday, May 31, 2017, at 2 p.m.;
WHEREAS undersigned counsel for the parties are agreeable to resetting the Scheduling
Conference to May 31, 2017, at 2 p.m.; and
WHEREAS the parties have neither stipulated to, nor requested, any other extension of
time for conducting the Scheduling Conference in this matter;
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE FOREGOING, IT IS HEREBY
STIPULATED by and between the parties that the Scheduling Conference in this matter may be
reset to May 31, 2017, at 2 p.m.
Dated: April 3, 2017
20
XAVIER BECERRA
Attorney General
By: /s/ Thomas M. Patton
Thomas M. Patton
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Defendants David M. Lanier;
Christine Baker; and Julie A. Su
21
22
23
24
Dated: April 3, 2017
25
26
27
28
IRELL & MANELLA LLP
David A. Schwarz
By: /s/ David A. Schwarz
David A. Schwarz
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Fowler Packing Company, Inc.; Gerawan
2
1
ORDER
2
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the Court orders as follows:
3
The Scheduling Conference in this matter is hereby reset to Wednesday, May 31, 2017, at
4
2.00 p.m., in Courtroom 9, before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. A joint scheduling report
5
is due one week before the conference date.
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
April 4, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?