Fowler Packing Company, Inc. et al v. Lanier et al
Filing
68
ORDER Granting 67 Motion for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/23/2017. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
FOWLER PACKING COMPANY, INC.
and GERAWAN FARMING, INC.,
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
No. 1:16-cv-00106-DAD-SAB
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE
TO FILE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF
v.
DAVID M. LANIER, in his official
capacity as Secretary of the California
Labor and Workforce Development
Agency; CHRISTINE BAKER, in her
official capacity as the California Director
of Industrial Relations; and JULIE SU, in
her official capacity as California Labor
Commissioner,
(Doc. No. 67)
Defendants.
20
21
Before the court is a motion for leave to file an amicus curiae brief regarding the currently
22
pending cross-motions for summary judgment. The pending motion was filed by Beatriz Aldapa
23
and Elmer Avalos—the proposed class representatives in Aldapa v. Fowler Packing, Inc., et al.,
24
Case No. 1:15-cv-00420-DAD-SAB—and Rafael Marquez Amaro, Jesus Alarcon Urzua, and the
25
class of certified workers in Amaro v. Gerawan Farming, Inc., Case No. 1:14-cv-00147-DAD-
26
SAB. (Doc. No. 67.) The motion and a supporting declaration indicate neither of the parties to
27
this dispute object to the proposed filing of the amicus curiae brief. (Id. at 3; Doc. No. 67-2 at
28
¶ 4.) Therefore, finding good cause and noting the lack of objections, the court grants the motion.
1
1
The amicus curiae brief submitted with the request (Doc. No. 67-1) shall be deemed filed. The
2
amicus parties may appear at the hearing on the cross-motions for summary judgment pending in
3
this action and are advised to comply with the court’s orders regarding appearances at that
4
hearing.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
Dated:
October 23, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?