Gonzalez v. City of Bakersfield

Filing 20

SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 4/4/2016. Pleading Amendment Deadline: 7/1/2016. Discovery Deadlines: Initial Disclosures 4/18/2016; Non-Expert 1/3/2017; Expert 3/3/2017. Mid-Discovery Status Conference set for 9/26/2016 at 08:30 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 3/10/2017; Hearing by 4/7/2017. Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 4/19/2017; Hearing by 5/ 31/2017. Pretrial Conference set for 7/5/2017 at 08:30 AM in Bakersfield at 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Jury Trial set for 8/21/2017 at 08:30 AM in Bakersfield at 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ARTURO GONZALEZ,

12
13
14
15
16

Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

17

Case No.: 1:16-CV-00107- JLT
SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16)
Pleading Amendment Deadline: 7/1/2016
Discovery Deadlines:
Initial Disclosures: 4/18/2016
Non-Expert: 1/3/2017
Expert: 3/3/2017
Mid-Discovery Status Conference:
9/26/2016 at 8:30 a.m.

18
Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 3/10/2017
Hearing: 4/7/2017

19
20
21

Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 4/19/2017
Hearing: 5/31/2017

22
23

Pre-Trial Conference:
7/5/2017 at 8:30 a.m.
510 19th Street, Bakersfield, CA

24
25

Trial: 8/21/2017 at 8:30 a.m.
510 19th Street, Bakersfield, CA
Jury trial: 5-7 days

26
27
28
1

1

I.

April 4, 2016.

2
3

Date of Scheduling Conference

II.

Appearances of Counsel

4

Thomas Seabaugh appeared on behalf of Plaintiff.

5

Heather Cohen appeared on behalf of Defendants.

6

III.

Pleading Amendment Deadline
Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or

7
8

motion to amend, no later than July 1, 2016.

9

IV.

10
11
12
13
14

Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date
The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)

on or before April 18, 2016.
The parties are ordered to complete all discovery, pertaining to non-experts no later than
January 3, 2017, and all discovery pertaining to experts on or before March 3, 2017.
The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses, in writing, on or January 10, 2017, and

15

to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before February 7, 2017. The written designation of retained and

16

non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B), and (C) and

17

shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in compliance with

18

this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered through such

19

experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.

20

The written designation of retained and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R.

21

Civ. P. 26(a)(2), (A), (B), and (C) and shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to

22

designate experts in compliance with this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other

23

evidence offered through such experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.

24

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to experts

25

and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions

26

included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may

27

include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony.

28

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party’s duty to timely supplement
2

1

disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced.
A mid-discovery status conference is scheduled for September 26, 2016 at 8:30 a.m. before the

2
3

Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge, at the United States District

4

Courthouse located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield, California. Counsel SHALL file a joint mid-

5

discovery status conference report, one week before the conference. Counsel SHALL also e-mail the

6

report in Word or .pdf format to [e-mail]. The joint statement SHALL outline

7

the discovery that has been completed and that which needs to be completed as well as any

8

impediments to completing the discovery within the deadlines set forth in this order. Counsel may

9

appear via the CourtCall service.

10
11

V.

Pre-Trial Motion Schedule
All non-dispositive pre-trial motions, including any discovery motions, shall be filed no later

12

than March 10, 2017, and heard on or before April 7, 2017. Non-dispositive motions are heard at 9:00

13

a.m. at the United States District Courthouse in Bakersfield, California, before the Honorable Jennifer

14

L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge.

15

No written discovery motions shall be filed without the prior approval of the assigned

16

Magistrate Judge. A party with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a good

17

faith effort to resolve by agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, the

18

moving party promptly shall seek a telephonic hearing with all involved parties and the Magistrate

19

Judge. It shall be the obligation of the moving party to arrange and originate the conference call to the

20

court. To schedule this telephonic hearing, the parties are ordered to contact Courtroom Deputy Clerk,

21

Susan Hall at [phone] or via email at [e-mail]. Counsel must comply with

22

Local Rule 251 with respect to discovery disputes or the motion will be denied without prejudice

23

and dropped from calendar.

24

In scheduling such motions, the Magistrate Judge may grant applications for an order shortening

25

time pursuant to Local Rule 144(e). However, if counsel does not obtain an order shortening time, the

26

notice of motion must comply with Local Rule 251.

27
28

Counsel may appear and argue non-dispositive motions by telephone, provided a written request
to so appear is made to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Clerk no later than five (5) court days before
3

1

the noticed hearing date. In the event that more than one attorney requests to appear by telephone then

2

it shall be the obligation of the moving part(ies) to arrange and originate a conference call to the court.
All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than April 19, 2017, and heard no later

3
4

than May 31, 2017, before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge, at the

5

United States District Courthouse in Bakersfield, California. In scheduling such motions, counsel shall

6

comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 and Local Rules 230 and 260.

7

VI.

Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication

8

At least 21 days before filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary

9

adjudication, the parties are ORDERED to meet, in person or by telephone, to confer about the issues

10

to be raised in the motion.

11

The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where a

12

question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in whole

13

or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4) narrow the

14

issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties incur the

15

expense of briefing a summary judgment motion; and, 6) to develop a joint statement of undisputed

16

facts.
The moving party SHALL initiate the meeting and SHALL provide a complete, proposed

17
18

statement of undisputed facts at least five days before the conference. The finalized joint statement of

19

undisputed facts SHALL include all facts that the parties agree, for purposes of the motion, may be

20

deemed true. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall file the joint

21

statement of undisputed facts.
In the notice of motion the moving party SHALL certify that the parties have met and conferred

22
23

as ordered above, or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer. Failure to

24

comply may result in the motion being stricken.

25

VII.

26
27
28

Pre-Trial Conference Date
July 5, 2017, at 8:30 a.m. at the United States District Courthouse in Bakersfield, California

before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge.
The parties are ordered to file a Joint Pretrial Statement pursuant to Local Rule 281(a)(2).
4

1

The parties are further directed to submit a digital copy of their pretrial statement in Word format,

2

directly to Judge Thurston’s chambers, by email at [e-mail].
Counsels' attention is directed to Rules 281 and 282 of the Local Rules of Practice for the

3
4

Eastern District of California, as to the obligations of counsel in preparing for the pre-trial conference.

5

The Court will insist upon strict compliance with those rules. In addition to the matters set forth in the

6

Local Rules the Joint Pretrial Statement shall include a Joint Statement of the case to be used by the

7

Court to explain the nature of the case to the jury during voir dire.

8

VIII. Trial Date
August 21, 2017, at 8:30 a.m. at the United States District Courthouse in Bakersfield,

9
10

California, before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge.

11

A.

This is a jury trial.

12

B.

Counsels' Estimate of Trial Time: 5-7 days.

13

C.

Counsels' attention is directed to Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of

14

California, Rule 285.

15

IX.

Settlement Conference

16

If the parties desire a conference with the Court, they may file a joint written request for a

17

settlement conference. Alternatively, the parties may file a joint written request for referral to the

18

Court’s Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program.

19

X.

20

Trial
Not applicable at this time.

21
22

XI.

25

Related Matters Pending
There are no pending related matters.

23
24

Request for Bifurcation, Appointment of Special Master, or other Techniques to Shorten

XII.

Compliance with Federal Procedure
All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

26

and the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any

27

amendments thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules to efficiently handle its

28

increasing case load, and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow both the Federal Rules of Civil
5

1

Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of California.

2

XIII. Effect of this Order

3

The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda most

4

suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If the

5

parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered

6

to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by

7

subsequent status conference.

8
9

The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a
showing of good cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations

10

extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by

11

affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause

12

for granting the relief requested.

13

Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.

14
15
16
17

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

April 4, 2016

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6