Deocampo et al v. City of Lindsay et al

Filing 42

ORDER DIRECTING the Clerk of the Court to CLOSE CASE signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 6/29/2017. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

RAY GONZALES and SHEILA
11 DEOCAMPO, in each case individually
and as a successor-in-interest to Joshua
12 Gonzales, deceased,

Case No.: 16-CV-00130 DAD (EPGx)

13

ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK
OF THE COURT TO CLOSE CASE

14

Plaintiffs,

[Judge Dale A. Drozd]
[Magistrate Erica P. Grosjean]

v.

15 CITY OF LINDSAY; ANDREW
LOFTIN; ELISEO MENDEZ; JUAN
16 ALCANTAR, and DOES 4-10,
inclusive,
17
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1ORDER CLOSING CASE

16-CV-00130 DAD (EPGx)

1

On June 28, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this action with

2 prejudice. (ECF No. 41.) Both parties have agreed to the dismissal. In light of the
3 stipulation, the case has ended, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of
4 San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and is dismissed with prejudice.
5 Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“Even if the defendant has
6 filed a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff may terminate his action voluntarily by filing
7 a notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1).”). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is
8 DIRECTED to close this case.
9
10
11
12

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

June 29, 2017

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2ORDER CLOSING CASE

16-CV-00130 DAD (EPGx)