Morse v. County of Merced et al

Filing 60

ORDER Extending Page Limitation for Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/18/2017. (Any motion for summary judgment be filed in this action and any opposition thereto shall each be no more than thirty-one (31) pages in length.)(Thorp, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ETHAN MORSE,

12
13
14
15
16

No. 1:16-cv-00142-DAD-SKO
Plaintiff,

v.
COUNTY OF MERCED, CHARLES
HALE, ERICK MACIAS, MERCED
COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT,
and JOSE SAM SANCHEZ,

ORDER EXTENDING PAGE LIMITATION
FOR MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT

Defendants.

17
18

On April 17, 2017, the parties to this action filed a stipulation seeking to extend the page

19

limitations for briefing for a motion for summary judgment in this action from twenty-five pages

20

to thirty-one pages. (Doc. No. 59 at 1.) The parties represent that the complexity and numerosity

21

of the claims involved in this case warrants an extension of the page limitation. Therefore, good

22

cause having been shown and the parties having stipulated, the court grants the parties’ request.

23

Any motion for summary judgment be filed in this action and any opposition thereto shall each be

24

no more than thirty-one (31) pages in length. All other page limits set by the Local Rules for

25

other briefs or motions remain unchanged by this order.

26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27

Dated:

April 18, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

28
1