Morse v. County of Merced et al
ORDER Extending Page Limitation for Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/18/2017. (Any motion for summary judgment be filed in this action and any opposition thereto shall each be no more than thirty-one (31) pages in length.)(Thorp, J)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF MERCED, CHARLES
HALE, ERICK MACIAS, MERCED
COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT,
and JOSE SAM SANCHEZ,
ORDER EXTENDING PAGE LIMITATION
FOR MOTION FOR SUMMARY
On April 17, 2017, the parties to this action filed a stipulation seeking to extend the page
limitations for briefing for a motion for summary judgment in this action from twenty-five pages
to thirty-one pages. (Doc. No. 59 at 1.) The parties represent that the complexity and numerosity
of the claims involved in this case warrants an extension of the page limitation. Therefore, good
cause having been shown and the parties having stipulated, the court grants the parties’ request.
Any motion for summary judgment be filed in this action and any opposition thereto shall each be
no more than thirty-one (31) pages in length. All other page limits set by the Local Rules for
other briefs or motions remain unchanged by this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
April 18, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?