Gray v. Elliott Family Construction, LLC

Filing 24

SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/30/2016. Pleading Amendment Deadline 9/19/2016. Discovery Deadlines: Non-Expert 2/20/2017; Expert 3/13/2017. Mid-Discovery Status Conference set for 12/12/2016 at 08:30 AM in Bak ersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 3/20/2017; Hearing by 4/17/2017. Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 5/3/2017; Hearing by 5/31/2017. Bench Trial set for 7/11/2017 at 08:30 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ARTHUR GRAY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ELLIOTT FAMILY CONSTRUCTION, LLC, ) ) Defendant. ) ) 17 18 Case No.: 1:16-CV-0156- JLT SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16) Pleading Amendment Deadline: 9/19/2016 Discovery Deadlines: Non-Expert: 2/20/2017 Expert: 3/13/2017 Mid-Discovery Status Conference: 12/12/2016 at 8:30 a.m. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filing: 3/20/2017 Hearing: 4/17/2017 19 20 Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filing: 5/3/2017 Hearing: 5/31/2017 21 22 Trial: 7/11/2017 at 8:30 a.m. 510 19th Street, Bakersfield, CA Bench trial: 3-5 days 23 24 25 26 I. June 30, 2016. 27 28 Date of Scheduling Conference /// 1 1 II. Appearances of Counsel 2 Raymond Ballister appeared on behalf of Plaintiff. 3 Katherine Sandberg appeared on behalf of Defendant. 4 III. Pleading Amendment Deadline Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or 5 6 motion to amend, no later than September 19, 2016. 7 IV. All claims as to “Doe” Defendants are hereby DISMISSED. 8 9 10 11 12 Fictitiously-Named Defendants V. Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date The parties are ordered to complete all discovery pertaining to non-experts on or before February 20, 2017, and all discovery pertaining to experts on or before March 13, 2017. The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses, in writing, on or January 30, 2017, and 13 to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before February 15, 2017. The written designation of retained 14 and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B), and (C) 15 and shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in compliance 16 with this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered through such 17 experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order. 18 The written designation of retained and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. 19 Civ. P. 26(a)(2), (A), (B), and (C) and shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to 20 designate experts in compliance with this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other 21 evidence offered through such experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order. 22 The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to experts 23 and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions 24 included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may 25 include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony. 26 27 28 The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party’s duty to timely supplement disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced. A mid-discovery status conference is scheduled for December 12, 2016 at 8:30 a.m. before the 2 1 Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, U.S. Magistrate Judge, located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield, 2 California. Counsel SHALL file a joint mid-discovery status conference report one week before the 3 conference. Counsel also SHALL lodge the status report via e-mail to JLTorders@caed.uscourts.gov. 4 The joint statement SHALL outline the discovery counsel have completed and that which needs to be 5 completed as well as any impediments to completing the discovery within the deadlines set forth in this 6 order. Counsel may appear via CourtCall, providing a written notice of the intent to appear 7 telephonically is provided to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Deputy Clerk no later than five court 8 days before the noticed hearing date. 9 VI. Pre-Trial Motion Schedule All non-dispositive pre-trial motions, including any discovery motions, shall be filed no later 10 11 than March 20, 2017, and heard on or before April 17, 2017. The Court hears non-dispositive motions 12 at 9:00 a.m. at the United States District Courthouse in Bakersfield, California. No motion to amend or stipulation to amend the case schedule will be entertained unless it 13 14 is filed at least one week before the first deadline the parties wish to extend. Likewise, no written 15 discovery motions shall be filed without the prior approval of the assigned Magistrate Judge. A party 16 with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a good faith effort to resolve by 17 agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, the moving party promptly 18 shall seek a telephonic hearing with all involved parties and the Magistrate Judge. It shall be the 19 obligation of the moving party to arrange and originate the conference call to the court. To schedule 20 this telephonic hearing, the parties are ordered to contact the Courtroom Deputy Clerk, Susan Hall, at 21 (661) 326-6620 or via email at SHall@caed.uscourts.gov. Counsel must comply with Local Rule 251 22 with respect to discovery disputes or the motion will be denied without prejudice and dropped 23 from the Court’s calendar. All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than May 3, 2017, and heard no later than 24 25 May 31, 2017, before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge, at the 26 United States District Courthouse in Bakersfield, California. In scheduling such motions, counsel shall 27 comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 and Local Rules 230 and 260. 28 /// 3 1 VII. Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication 2 At least 21 days before filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary 3 adjudication, the parties are ORDERED to meet, in person or by telephone, to confer about the issues 4 to be raised in the motion. 5 The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where a 6 question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in whole 7 or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4) narrow the 8 issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties incur the 9 expense of briefing a motion; and 6) to develop a joint statement of undisputed facts. The moving party SHALL initiate the meeting and SHALL provide a complete, proposed 10 11 statement of undisputed facts at least five days before the conference. The finalized joint statement of 12 undisputed facts SHALL include all facts that the parties agree, for purposes of the motion, may be 13 deemed true. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall file the joint 14 statement of undisputed facts. In the notice of motion the moving party SHALL certify that the parties have met and conferred 15 16 as ordered above, or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer. Failure to 17 comply may result in the motion being stricken. 18 VIII. Trial Date July 11, 2017, at 8:30 a.m. at the United States District Courthouse in Bakersfield, California, 19 20 before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge. 21 A. This is a bench trial. 22 B. Counsels' Estimate of Trial Time: 3-5 days. 23 C. Counsels' attention is directed to Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of 24 California, Rule 285. 25 IX. Settlement Conference 26 If the parties desire a conference with the Court, they may file a joint written request for a 27 settlement conference. Alternatively, the parties may file a joint written request for referral to the 28 Court’s Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program. 4 1 X. Request for Bifurcation, Appointment of Special Master, or other Techniques 2 to Shorten Trial 3 Not applicable at this time. 4 XI. Related Matters Pending There are no pending related matters. 5 6 7 XII. Compliance with Federal Procedure All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8 and the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any 9 amendments thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules to efficiently handle its 10 increasing case load, and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow both the Federal Rules of Civil 11 Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of California. 12 XIII. Effect of this Order 13 The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda most 14 suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If the 15 parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered 16 to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by 17 subsequent status conference. 18 The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a 19 showing of good cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations 20 extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by 21 affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause 22 for granting the relief requested. 23 Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions. 24 25 26 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 30, 2016 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?