Cebrero v. Frauenheim
Filing
46
ORDER Granting 45 Motion to Suspend Briefing; ORDER Directing Petitioner to Submit Transcript of Marsden Hearing, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 5/30/17. 30-Day Deadline. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
OMAR CEBRERO,
12
13
14
15
Petitioner,
v.
S. FRAUENHEIM,
Respondent.
16
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:16-cv-00173-DAD-JLT (HC)
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SUSPEND
BRIEFING [ECF No. 45]
ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO SUBMIT
TRANSCRIPT OF MARSDEN HEARING
[30-DAY DEADLINE]
On March 20, 2017, the Court issued an order directing Respondent to file a response to the
18
petition. Respondent was granted an extension of time on May 19, 2017. On May 26, 2017,
19
Respondent filed a motion to suspend briefing.
20
Respondent notes that Petitioner claims his defense counsel rendered ineffective assistance by
21
not allowing him to testify at trial. In support of this argument, Petitioner cites to a hearing held in the
22
trial court pursuant to People v. Marsden, 2 Cal.3d 118 (1970). Since the Marsden hearing is relevant
23
to his claim, according to 28 U.S.C. § 2254(f), Petitioner has an affirmative duty to provide, if he is
24
able to, the transcript of the proceeding to the Court for unsealing and transmission to Respondent. In
25
the meantime, Respondent requests that briefing be suspended. Good cause having been presented,
26
Respondent’s motion to suspend briefing will be granted.
27
28
ORDER
Accordingly, the Court ORDERS:
1) Respondent’s request to suspend briefing [ECF No. 45] is GRANTED;
1
1
2) Petitioner is DIRECTED to provide a copy of the transcript of the Marsden hearing within
thirty days, if he is able; and
2
3
3) If Petitioner cannot do so, he must NOTIFY the Court of his reasons.
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
May 30, 2017
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?