Eli Lilly and Company v. Gitmed et al

Filing 16

ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO SERVICE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/3/2016. (Hernandez, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

REED SMITH LLP

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware

10
11
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, an Indiana
12 corporation,
13 Plaintiff,
14 vs.
15 JOHN DEREK GITMED, an individual;
HOLLY GITMED, an individual; FELICIA
16 GITMED, an individual; ANTHONY
POLLINO JR., an individual; and DOES 1-50,
17 inclusive,
18 Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

No. 1:16−CV−00178−DAD-SAB
ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO SERVE
SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT

On May 3, 2016, during the Mandatory Scheduling Conference in this action, Plaintiff Eli

1

2 Lilly and Company, by and through its counsel of record, requested that this Court enter an Order
3 enlarging the time to serve the Summons and Complaint in this action by sixty (60) days, on the
4 grounds that Plaintiff had not yet been able to serve one of the incarcerated defendants, despite
5 diligent efforts to do so.
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, Plaintiff Eli Lilly and Company shall have

6

7 until July 8, 2016 to serve the Summons and Complaint on the incarcerated defendant, John
8 Gitmed.
9

REED SMITH LLP

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware

10

IT IS SO ORDERED.

11 Dated:

May 3, 2016
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
–2–