Sullivan v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 16

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPENING BRIEF. Plaintiffs opening brief shall be filed on or before November 2, 2016;Defendants opposition shall be filed on or before December 5, 2016; Plaintiffs reply, if any, shall be filed on or before December 23, 2016; and The parties are advised that due to the impact of social security cases on the Courts docket and the Courts desire to have cases decided in an expedient manner, requests for modification of the brie fing scheduling will not routinely be granted and will only be granted upon a showing of good cause. Further, requests to modify the briefing schedule that are made on the eve of a deadline will be looked upon with disfavor and may be denied absent good cause for the delay in seeking an extension. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/30/2016. (Hernandez, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 CAROLYN SULLIVAN, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 Case No. 1:16-cv-00186-SAB ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPENING BRIEF v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY. (ECF No. 15) Defendant. 16 17 18 On September 30, 2016, Plaintiff filed a stipulation for an extension of time to file her 19 opening brief. (ECF No. 15.) 20 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 21 1. Plaintiff’s opening brief shall be filed on or before November 2, 2016; 22 2. Defendant’s opposition shall be filed on or before December 5, 2016; 23 3. Plaintiff’s reply, if any, shall be filed on or before December 23, 2016; and 24 4. The parties are advised that due to the impact of social security cases on the 25 Court’s docket and the Court’s desire to have cases decided in an expedient 26 manner, requests for modification of the briefing scheduling will not routinely be 27 granted and will only be granted upon a showing of good cause. Further, requests 28 to modify the briefing schedule that are made on the eve of a deadline will be 1 1 looked upon with disfavor and may be denied absent good cause for the delay in 2 seeking an extension. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: September 30, 2016 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?