Espinoza v. California Highway Patrol et al

Filing 24

Defendant City of Bakersfield Has Been Dismissed Without Prejudice, ORDER, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/18/16. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ERNEST J. ESPINOZA,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16

No. 1:16-cv-00193-DAD-JLT

v.

DEFENDANT CITY OF BAKERSFIELD HAS
BEEN DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE

CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, a
government entity; CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD, a government entity;
OFFICER MATT A. ASHE, an individual;
and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive,

17

(Doc. No. 22)

Defendants.

18
19

On April 15, 2016, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing defendant City of

20

Bakersfield without prejudice. (Doc. No. 22.) In light of the parties’ stipulation, defendant City

21

of Bakersfield has been terminated from the case, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v.

22

City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed without prejudice.

23

This dismissal does not affect the status of the other defendants in the matter.

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25

Dated:

April 18, 2016
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

26
27
28
1