Mora v. Zeta Interactive Corp. et al

Filing 50

ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO MEET AND CONFER AND FILE EITHER A SUPPLEMENTAL JOINT STATEMENT OR A NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF THE MOTION TO COMPEL. ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO FILE A COPY OF THEIR PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: The parties shall conduct a meaningful meet and confer in person or by telephone regarding the issues in the instant motion to compel on or before January 31, 2017; The parties shall file a supplemental joint statement detailing the parties renewed meet and confer efforts and any additional information for the motion, or a notice of withdrawal of the motion to compel, on or before January 31, 2017; and If Plaintiff does not withdraw the motion to compel and Defendants request a protective order that is different from Plaintiffs proposed protective order, Defendants shall file a copy of their proposed protective order on or before January 31, 2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/24/2017. (Hernandez, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 SERGIO MORA, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 Case No. 1:16-cv-00198-DAD-SAB ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO MEET AND CONFER AND FILE EITHER A SUPPLEMENTAL JOINT STATEMENT OR A NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF THE MOTION TO COMPEL v. ZETA INTERACTIVE CORP., et al., 15 ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO FILE A COPY OF THEIR PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 16 (ECF Nos. 46, 49) 14 17 Defendants. Plaintiff Sergio Mora filed this action on February 11, 2016. On January 17, 2017, 18 Plaintiff filed a motion to compel discovery with a hearing on the motion set for February 8, 19 2017. (ECF No. 46.) The parties filed a joint statement re discovery disagreement on January 20 23, 2017. (ECF No. 49.) 21 Plaintiff contends that the parties met and conferred by telephone on December 15, 2016, 22 but they were unable to reach a resolution on the matters in the instant dispute. Defendants 23 respond that Defendants’ counsel indicated during the meet and confer and follow-up email 24 correspondence that Defendants are still investigating Plaintiff’s claims and document requests. 25 Defendants state that Plaintiff prematurely filed this motion without inquiring into the status of 26 Defendants’ investigation, which is ongoing. 27 Accordingly, the Court finds that it is in the interest of judicial economy for the parties to 28 conduct another meet and confer on or before January 31, 2017. The parties shall conduct a 1 1 meaningful meet and confer either in person or by telephone regarding the issues in the instant 2 motion to compel. The parties shall file a supplemental joint statement detailing the renewed meet and 3 4 confer efforts and any additional information for the motion, or file a notice of withdrawal of the 5 motion to compel, on or before January 31, 2017. In the January 23, 2017 joint statement re discovery disagreement, Defendants refer to 6 7 Zeta’s proposed protective order, but they did not attach it to the joint statement or otherwise 8 provide it to the Court. If Plaintiff does not withdraw the motion to compel and Defendants 9 request that the Court enter a protective order that is different from Plaintiff’s proposed 10 protective order, Defendants shall provide a copy of their proposed protective order on or before 11 January 31, 2017. 12 Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 13 1. The parties shall conduct a meaningful meet and confer in person or by telephone 14 regarding the issues in the instant motion to compel on or before January 31, 15 2017; 2. 16 The parties shall file a supplemental joint statement detailing the parties’ renewed 17 meet and confer efforts and any additional information for the motion, or a notice 18 of withdrawal of the motion to compel, on or before January 31, 2017; and 3. 19 If Plaintiff does not withdraw the motion to compel and Defendants request a 20 protective order that is different from Plaintiff’s proposed protective order, 21 Defendants shall file a copy of their proposed protective order on or before 22 January 31, 2017. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: January 24, 2017 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?