Alvarez v. Hashemi

Filing 54

ORDER GRANTING Defendant's Motion for Leave to File a Reply to Plaintiff's Separate Statement in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/4/19. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
RAUL ALVAREZ,

11

Plaintiff,

12
v.

13

NASTRAM HASHEMI, M.D.,

14

Defendant.

15

1:16-cv-00203-AWI-JLT (PC)
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY
TO PLAINTIFF’S SEPARATE
STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(Doc. 53)

16
17

Considering the recent order granting Plaintiff an extension of time to file a separate

18

statement in opposition to Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, Defendant requests leave

19

to file a reply. (Doc. 53.) Good cause having been presented to the court the Court ORDERS

20

that Defendant is granted seven days1 to file a reply from the date of service of Plaintiff’s separate

21

statement, as allowed in the December 21, 2018 order.

22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

24

January 4, 2019

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

25
26
27
28

1

This is the usual time allowed for a reply in prisoner cases. See L.R. 230(l).