Fuller v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 21

ORDER GRANTING 20 a Second Extension of Time, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 5/11/2017. Opening brief due by 5/17/2017. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIE EARL FULLER, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL1, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 17 ) Case No.: 1:16-cv-00216- JLT ) ) ORDER GRANTING A SECOND EXTENSION OF ) TIME ) ) ) ) ) ) The parties filed a stipulation for a seven-day extension of time for Plaintiff to file an opening 18 brief. (Doc. 20) Notably, the Scheduling Order allows for a single extension of thirty days by the 19 stipulation (Doc. 8 at 4), which was previously used by Plaintiff. (Docs. 18, 19) Beyond that 20 extension, “requests to modify [the scheduling] order must be made by written motion and will be 21 granted only for good cause.” (Doc. 8 at 4) Accordingly, the Court construes the stipulation to be a 22 motion by Plaintiff for modification of the briefing schedule. 23 Plaintiff’s counsel reports a further extension is necessary because she had “significant and 24 unanticipated time away from the office.” (Doc. 20 at 2) In addition, Defendant does not object to the 25 request (see id.), and it does not appear there would be any prejudice caused to Defendant with the brief 26 27 1 28 Nancy A. Berryhill is now the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court substitutes Nancy A. Berryhill for her predecessor, Carolyn W. Colvin, as the defendant. 1 1 extension. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS: 2 1. Plaintiff’s request for a second extension of time is GRANTED; and 3 2. Plaintiff SHALL file a an opening brief on or before May 17, 2017. 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 11, 2017 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?