Larson v. Harman-Management Corporation et al
Filing
195
ORDER DIRECTING the Clerk to TERMINATE Defendant 3Seventy, Inc. signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/13/2019. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CORY LARSON,
12
13
14
15
16
No. 1:16-cv-000219-DAD-SKO
Plaintiff,
v.
HARMAN-MANAGEMENT
CORPORATION and 3SEVENTY, INC,
ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO
TERMINATE DEFENDANT 3SEVENTY,
INC.
(Doc. 194)
Defendants.
17
18
On June 12, 2019, Plaintiff and Defendant 3Seventy, Inc. (“3Seventy”) filed a stipulation
19
of dismissal of 3Seventy, without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
20
41(a)(1)(A). (Doc. 194.)
21
In relevant part, Rule 41(a)(1)(A) provides as follows:
22
24
[A] plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of
dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for
summary judgment; or (ii) a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have
appeared.
25
Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). “The plaintiff may dismiss some or all of the defendants, or some or
26
all of his claims, through a Rule 41(a)(1) notice,” and the dismissal “automatically terminates the
27
action as to the defendants who are the subjects of the notice.” Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111
23
28
1
F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997).
2
Because Plaintiff and 3Seventy filed a stipulation of dismissal without prejudice under Rule
3
41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this case has automatically terminated as to Defendant 3Seventy, Inc. Fed. R. Civ.
4
P. 41(a)(1)(A). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to TERMINATE Defendant 3Seventy,
5
Inc.
This case shall remain OPEN pending resolution of Plaintiff’s case against the remaining
6
7
defendant.
8
9
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
June 13, 2019
/s/
Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?