Larson v. Harman-Management Corporation et al

Filing 195

ORDER DIRECTING the Clerk to TERMINATE Defendant 3Seventy, Inc. signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/13/2019. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CORY LARSON,

12
13
14
15
16

No. 1:16-cv-000219-DAD-SKO
Plaintiff,

v.
HARMAN-MANAGEMENT
CORPORATION and 3SEVENTY, INC,

ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO
TERMINATE DEFENDANT 3SEVENTY,
INC.
(Doc. 194)

Defendants.

17
18

On June 12, 2019, Plaintiff and Defendant 3Seventy, Inc. (“3Seventy”) filed a stipulation

19

of dismissal of 3Seventy, without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

20

41(a)(1)(A). (Doc. 194.)

21

In relevant part, Rule 41(a)(1)(A) provides as follows:

22

24

[A] plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of
dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for
summary judgment; or (ii) a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have
appeared.

25

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). “The plaintiff may dismiss some or all of the defendants, or some or

26

all of his claims, through a Rule 41(a)(1) notice,” and the dismissal “automatically terminates the

27

action as to the defendants who are the subjects of the notice.” Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111

23

28

1

F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997).

2

Because Plaintiff and 3Seventy filed a stipulation of dismissal without prejudice under Rule

3

41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this case has automatically terminated as to Defendant 3Seventy, Inc. Fed. R. Civ.

4

P. 41(a)(1)(A). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to TERMINATE Defendant 3Seventy,

5

Inc.
This case shall remain OPEN pending resolution of Plaintiff’s case against the remaining

6
7

defendant.

8
9
10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

June 13, 2019

/s/

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

.